lydiaxuxin wrote:But does "fashioned" in A&B must modify empire? in the sentence I read in other post:
John left the building, excited that he had just aced the GMAT
clearly "excited" modifies John, not the building
I am confused is there any specific rule for comma+v-ed that it should modify the nearest noun?
Dear
lydiaxuxin,
I'm happy to respond.
As you may know, for most noun modifiers, the
Modifier Touch Rule is in effect. This is a very important rule to know. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/
What you are calling the verb-ed is technically called the
past participle. It's good to learn the grammatical names if you want to understand grammar in depth. Participles are considerably more flexible --- they can be noun-modifiers, verb-modifiers, etc. In the sentence you quote, it's not clear whether "
excited" is a noun-modifier modifying "
John," or a verb-modifier modifying the verb or the entire clause. Verb-modifiers are NOT subject to the Touch Rule. Furthermore, in that simple sentence there are only two nouns, and it's clear that "
building" is the not target. That sentence is unambiguous.
Now, think about
(A):
Many of the earliest known images of Hindu deities in India date from the time of the Kushan empire, fashioned either from....
That's a lot of nouns!! The modifier beginning "
fashioned" is clearly a noun-modifier. The default assumption is that the target noun, the noun modified, is the noun it touches, "
Kushan empire." Now, if the predicate were short, the target noun could be the subject, but this is a LONG predicate with whole string of nouns, any one of which grammatically could be the target noun if we are suspending the Touch Rule. There is, at the very least, some ambiguity about the target of the modifier, and this ambiguity is fully resolved by changing the past participle noun-modifier "
fashioned" to a full past tense verb "
were fashioned" in parallel to the first verb: then quite obviously, the subject is the same, and we know exactly what "
were fashioned."
Also, notice that all the answers other than the OA,
(D), completely fail the
Once Outside, Twice Inside rule for Parallelism. For more on that, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-paral ... ce-inside/
Does all this make sense?
Mike
