BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

First Trenches

Expert replies
by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:59 am
Hi All,

In the below question, the OA is E. I was able to narrow down to A and E. But could not decide which one is better ? Can some one please help ?

============================================
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.


A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but

B. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also

C. having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but

D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also

E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: First Trenches

by El Cucu » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:51 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:Hi All,

In the below question, the OA is E. I was able to narrow down to A and E. But could not decide which one is better ? Can some one please help ?

============================================
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.


A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but

B. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also

C. having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but

D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also

E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
Evidence for societies that were arising or evidence that societies arose? I think the former is awkward.
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:56 pm
3:2 split again.. yields vs have yielded.. We can strike out B and D.. a present perfect is required here as we are pointing to an action that happened at an unspecified time before now..

also we can strike out A and C for multiple reasons..

a] that were is redundant.. arising is incorrect.. need simple past..

c] having been and arising is incorrect.. simple past is required..

Option left is E
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:18 pm
The above is OG-12 Q#68...for kicking out C...OG says "having been cut...." is unnecessarily wordy....can someone please tell why the same is wordy....why the same cannot be kicked out on the basis of wrong tense....i.e. "having been" it says that activity was already completed before some other activity started....

Please tell what i am missing here ?
Join the discussion

by kyabe » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:26 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:The above is OG-12 Q#68...for kicking out C...OG says "having been cut...." is unnecessarily wordy....can someone please tell why the same is wordy....why the same cannot be kicked out on the basis of wrong tense....i.e. "having been" it says that activity was already completed before some other activity started....

Please tell what i am missing here ?
As far as i am concerned it is more of a tense issue rather than just wordy.. Because "having been cut" conveys that the cutting is going on ...
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:31 pm
kyabe wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:The above is OG-12 Q#68...for kicking out C...OG says "having been cut...." is unnecessarily wordy....can someone please tell why the same is wordy....why the same cannot be kicked out on the basis of wrong tense....i.e. "having been" it says that activity was already completed before some other activity started....

Please tell what i am missing here ?
As far as i am concerned it is more of a tense issue rather than just wordy.. Because "having been cut" conveys that the cutting is going on ...
Hi Kyabe,

i guess...having been says activity completed.....

can you please tell what is the difference between
a) first trenches "having cut" blah blah
b) first trenches "having been cut" blah blah

please tell if any one of the above or both are wrong gramatically as per GMAT.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:38 pm
yes "having been" denotes a completed activity. it shows "y happened after x happened"

for eg: having been denied a promotion, the worker resigned (resignation after the denial)

so, the trenches after being cut, provided a strong evidence= makes sense but is too wordy

a) first trenches "having cut" => the trenches cut something by themselves. active voice. makes no sense

b) first trenches "having been cut" => the trenches were cut. passive voice. ok
Last edited by scoobydooby on Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:43 pm
scoobydooby wrote:yes "having been" denotes a completed activity. it shows because of x, y happened.

for eg: having been denied a promotion, the worker resigned (gives the reason for the workers resignation)

here, just by virtue of having been cut, the trenches couldnt provide a strong evidence. so it is awkward.

a) first trenches "having cut" => the trenches cut something by themselves. active voice. makes no sense

b) first trenches "having been cut" => the trenches were cut. passive voice
Thanks Scooby.

I guess....our way of kicking out based on completed tense looks to be better than OG way of wordiness...

what you guys think...of there is something that I am missing here...that additionally OG want to say ?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:46 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:
scoobydooby wrote:yes "having been" denotes a completed activity. it shows because of x, y happened.

for eg: having been denied a promotion, the worker resigned (gives the reason for the workers resignation)

here, just by virtue of having been cut, the trenches couldnt provide a strong evidence. so it is awkward.

a) first trenches "having cut" => the trenches cut something by themselves. active voice. makes no sense

b) first trenches "having been cut" => the trenches were cut. passive voice
Thanks Scooby.

I guess....our way of kicking out based on completed tense looks to be better than OG way of wordiness...

what you guys think...of there is something that I am missing here...that additionally OG want to say ?
no, just edited my previous post. og explanation is correct. "having been" is not wrong in terms of tense or logic. its just not as concise as E
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:55 pm
Thanks Scooby.

For kicking out A...OG says:

"that were .....that were arising" is wordy....

can you please tell why the same is wordy and how to find out the same that it is wordy....?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:28 pm
1) "trenches that were cut into x" is wordier than
"trenches, cut into x"

2) "regions....were arising simultaneously but independently" is wordier than "regions ....rose simultaneously". also the past continuous tense is not needed here. simple past tense explains the meaning just as well.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Oct 07, 2009 2:45 pm
Received a PM asking me to reply. Scooby's got it. In general, we default to simple tenses unless we have to use a more complex tense. And we prefer less wordy if we have that option. E gives us both of those things, so E is better than A.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1