CR question

Expert replies

[email protected]: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 3; Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:03 am

by [email protected] » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:04 am

In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?
A. Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
B. Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
C. The undated document was written before 1765.
D. The arrest record was written after the undated document.
E. The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.

Could someone please shed some light on this question and analyse the answer choices?

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:04 am

GMAT/MBA Expert

[email protected]: Elite Legendary Member; Posts: 10392; Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pmFollowed by: 511 members; Location: Palo Alto, CA; Thanked: 2867 times; GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:20 pm

Hi theodora.alexe,

This CR prompt is an example of an Inference question, so we have to be clear on the facts we've been given, then find an answer that is logically based on (or "extends from") those facts. The key to solving this question is to connect the two pieces of historical evidence.

The Facts:
-A researcher found 2 documents about Erich Schnitzler.
1st Doc: Dated May 3, 1739 - a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license
2nd Doc: Undated - Schnitzler makes a statement that he HAS BEEN peddling for 20 years.

The Logic:
Since we know that Schnitzler was arrested on May 3, 1739 for peddling, that arrest MUST have occurred at some point during the 20 years that Schnitzler was peddling. Maybe the arrest was early in the 20 years, maybe it was near the end (or any time in between), but it WAS sometime during that time span. This gives us a "window" of time in which Schnitzler COULD have been peddling: A 20-year window some time between 1719 and 1759.

This isn't much information to work with, so the inference shouldn't be too hard to match up. Answer C aligns with the "date data" that we were given.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Contact Rich at [email protected]

Like this post

[email protected]: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 3; Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:03 am

by [email protected] » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:34 am

Very helpful answer! Thank you!

Like this post

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review