Critical Reasoning

Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that EACH TIME RESTRICTIONS ON THE ADVERTISING OF LEGAL SERVICES HAVE BEEN ELMINATED, THE NUMBER OF LAWYERS ADVERTISING THEIR SERVICES HAS INCREASED AND LEGAL COSTS TO CONSUMERS HAVE DECLINED IN CONSEQUENCE. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumers' legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and IF NO LONGER REQUIRED TO SPECIFY FEE ARRANGEMENTS, MANY LAWYERS WHO NOW ADVERTISE WOULD INCREASE THEIR FEES.

B. the first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.

C. the first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction

this is crazyness.. A, D and E were quickly eliminated.