OG10 -21

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:04 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members

OG10 -21

by venmic » Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:07 pm
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but {in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy,} the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior


Why is B right

how does in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy modify perpetrators

Thanks
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:43 pm

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Thu Sep 15, 2011 1:26 am
Very tough question but an important one....i shall take care of this in future.

• Page 1 of 1