BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Land area

Expert replies
by vaibhav.iit2002 » Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:08 am
Laos has a land area about the same size as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many are members of hill tribes.

A. about the same size as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many
B. of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only four million, and many
C. that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them
D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many
E. comparable to that of Great Britain, but a population of only four million, many of whom
Last edited by vaibhav.iit2002 on Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mruzeful » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:41 am
I go with D..

E sounded right but I feel 'that' in

Laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain..

has no clear referrant
Join the discussion

by capnx » Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:55 am
down to D and E, and I picked E.

E sounds better to me in terms of parallelism and modification: Laos has a land area... but a population... many of whom...

D's last part on "and many" is not really parallel and rather vague (many of what?)
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:04 am
D. Laos has a land area ...blah blah ...but [has] only four million in population, and many
E. Laos hasa land area ...blah blah ... but[has] a population of only four million, many of whom


D seems clearly wrong as "has" can't be assumed there, it should read but isonly four million in population

What say??
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:18 pm
vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:E. Laos hasa land area ...blah blah ... but[has] a population of only four million, many of whom


D seems clearly wrong as "has" can't be assumed there, it should read but isonly four million in population

What say??
In E, there is a comma before BUT. Can we assume HAS after BUT.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:31 pm
D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many <- Land area is compared with Great Britain... it should be compared with land area of GB.. IMO..

E. comparable to that of Great Britain, but a population of only four million, many of whom <- many of whom is correct IMO..
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:46 pm
nervesofsteel wrote:D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many <- Land area is compared with Great Britain... it should be compared with land area of GB.. IMO..

E. comparable to that of Great Britain, but a population of only four million, many of whom <- many of whom is correct IMO..
Doesn't answer my question - below.
In E, there is a comma before BUT. Can we assume HAS after BUT.
Join the discussion

Whom reference: Kaplan Method

by mani090406 » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:40 am
Please can a Kaplan instructor tell me that how does "whom" refer to " people" in above example as written in OG 12.

I implemented the Kaplan extract method :

1) Isolated the relative pronoun in its own clause :

"whom are many members of the hill tribe"

2)who or whom are many members of hill tribe

Answer i chose : "they are" not "them are"

Hence "whom" must have been incorrect.

Please advise where i am wrong.

Many Thanks
mayank
Join the discussion

by Ludacrispat26 » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:03 am
Don't stop believin'...
Join the discussion

by Ludacrispat26 » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:09 am
Don't stop believin'...
Join the discussion

by vineetbatra » Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:49 am
Can someone please explain why E will not be a run on sentence. It has a subject Many of whom and a verb are.
Join the discussion

by chendawg » Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:43 pm
I'm not too sure what I'm supposed to take away from this problem. Anyone have light on what concrete issues there are for this problem, other than just general idiomatic issues?
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!
Join the discussion