Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:In B and E, AS not only...but also AS is not parallel. Eliminate B and E.GmatKiss wrote:The duality between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division but also as a possible reason that Raccine, in an age of optimism, selected tragedy as the preferred form.
1) between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division
2) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen as not only an internal division
3) between theatrical life of Raccine and his faithful and devotional life should be seen not only as an internal division
4) between Raccine's life in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division
5) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his faithful and devotional life should be seen as not only an internal division
IMO:[spoiler]D What is your pick![/spoiler]
In A, between how Raccine lived...and his life lacks parallelism. Also, how Raccine lived in the theatre could imply that the theatre was literally Racccine's place of residence. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate A.
C needs to say between THE theatrical life of Raccine. Also, theatrical life could imply that Raccine's life was exaggerated and especially dramatic, one definition of theatrical. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate C.
The correct answer is D.
Thanks a lot for your response. I have one confusion in option D i.e are we testing any parallelism in option D i.e is life in the theatre parallel to life of faith and devotion???? though I agree both parts are using possessive Raccine's and his.........please help












