Duality

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:57 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
GmatKiss wrote:The duality between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division but also as a possible reason that Raccine, in an age of optimism, selected tragedy as the preferred form.

1) between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

2) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen as not only an internal division

3) between theatrical life of Raccine and his faithful and devotional life should be seen not only as an internal division

4) between Raccine's life in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

5) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his faithful and devotional life should be seen as not only an internal division

IMO:[spoiler]D What is your pick![/spoiler]
In B and E, AS not only...but also AS is not parallel. Eliminate B and E.

In A, between how Raccine lived...and his life lacks parallelism. Also, how Raccine lived in the theatre could imply that the theatre was literally Racccine's place of residence. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate A.

C needs to say between THE theatrical life of Raccine. Also, theatrical life could imply that Raccine's life was exaggerated and especially dramatic, one definition of theatrical. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate C.

The correct answer is D.
Hi Mitch,

Thanks a lot for your response. I have one confusion in option D i.e are we testing any parallelism in option D i.e is life in the theatre parallel to life of faith and devotion???? though I agree both parts are using possessive Raccine's and his.........please help

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:41 am
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:650

by prashant.mishra » Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:33 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
GmatKiss wrote:The duality between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division but also as a possible reason that Raccine, in an age of optimism, selected tragedy as the preferred form.

1) between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

2) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen as not only an internal division

3) between theatrical life of Raccine and his faithful and devotional life should be seen not only as an internal division

4) between Raccine's life in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

5) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his faithful and devotional life should be seen as not only an internal division

IMO:[spoiler]D What is your pick![/spoiler]
In B and E, AS not only...but also AS is not parallel. Eliminate B and E.

In A, between how Raccine lived...and his life lacks parallelism. Also, how Raccine lived in the theatre could imply that the theatre was literally Racccine's place of residence. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate A.

C needs to say between THE theatrical life of Raccine. Also, theatrical life could imply that Raccine's life was exaggerated and especially dramatic, one definition of theatrical. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate C.

The correct answer is D.
But in D, it says "Raccine's" life in the theater....(possessive case).. This leaves the pronoun "his" in the second part without any antecedent. GmatGuruNY, please correct me if i am wrong, but this is what I have understood that the pronoun has to have a clear antecedent and that the possessive case does not imply that the pronoun "his" refers to Raccine.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:39 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by czarczar » Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:05 am
prashant.mishra wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
GmatKiss wrote:The duality between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division but also as a possible reason that Raccine, in an age of optimism, selected tragedy as the preferred form.

1) between how Raccine lived in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

2) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen as not only an internal division

3) between theatrical life of Raccine and his faithful and devotional life should be seen not only as an internal division

4) between Raccine's life in the theatre and his life of faith and devotion should be seen not only as an internal division

5) between Raccine's life of the theatre and his faithful and devotional life should be seen as not only an internal division

IMO:[spoiler]D What is your pick![/spoiler]
In B and E, AS not only...but also AS is not parallel. Eliminate B and E.

In A, between how Raccine lived...and his life lacks parallelism. Also, how Raccine lived in the theatre could imply that the theatre was literally Racccine's place of residence. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate A.

C needs to say between THE theatrical life of Raccine. Also, theatrical life could imply that Raccine's life was exaggerated and especially dramatic, one definition of theatrical. The intended meaning of the sentence is that Raccine WORKED in the theatre. Eliminate C.

The correct answer is D.
But in D, it says "Raccine's" life in the theater....(possessive case).. This leaves the pronoun "his" in the second part without any antecedent. GmatGuruNY, please correct me if i am wrong, but this is what I have understood that the pronoun has to have a clear antecedent and that the possessive case does not imply that the pronoun "his" refers to Raccine.

Always remember that his is a possessive pronoun and that possessive pronouns can stand for possessive nouns(which is Raccine's in this sentence).

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:55 pm
aspirant2011 wrote:
Hi Mitch,

Thanks a lot for your response. I have one confusion in option D i.e are we testing any parallelism in option D i.e is life in the theatre parallel to life of faith and devotion???? though I agree both parts are using possessive Raccine's and his.........please help
The phrases are parallel. Each exhibits the same construction: possessive + noun + prepositional modifier. The prepositions differ because the meanings differ. A life in the theatre implies a life spent working IN the theatre. A life of faith and devotion implies a life full OF faith and devotion.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3