DS(Statistics)

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:19 am
Location: Cape Town
Thanked: 6 times

DS(Statistics)

by rintoo22 » Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:35 pm
If the average (arithmetic mean) of the assessed values
of x houses is $212,000 and the average of the assessed
values of y other houses is $194,000, what is the average
of the assessed values of the x+y houses?
(1) x+y=36
(2) x=2y

The way I solved it.
Total cost of the x houses = 212000x
Total cost of the y houses = 194000y
So the average of the assessed values of the x+y houses is

(212000x + 194000y)/(x+y) .......(1)

Statement 1 : Not Sufficient as it only gives the value of x+y=36
Statement 2 : In my opinion Sufficient

(212000(2y) + 194000(y))/(2y+y)
(212000(2y) + 194000(y))/(3y)
618000y/3y = 206000
Hence the answer is B.

However the QA is given a C.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 423
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:2 members

by srcc25anu » Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:34 pm
I would also think the answer should be B
If we know the ratio of X and Y, that should be sufficient to know the weighted average of those two.

Since we know x = 2y:
212,000 *2y + 194,000*y / (3Y)
=> 618,000y/3y (Y cancels out)
Thus average of X+Y houses = 206,000
hence SUFFICIENT

A is clearly NOT sufficient. we do not know X and Y individually. Insufficient.

Ans B

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:53 pm
rintoo22 wrote:Statement 2 : In my opinion Sufficient

(212000(2y) + 194000(y))/(2y+y)
(212000(2y) + 194000(y))/(3y)
618000y/3y = 206000

Hence the answer is B.
You are correct. The answer should be B.
However, I'd like to point out that the two green lines are unnecessary time wasting for DS problem. From the first line itself we can see that all the y's will cancel out from the numerator and denominator, i.e. we have a definite number which doesn't include any unknown variable. Hence, the statement is sufficient.

For DS problems if we can definitely solve or eliminate the unknowns, we are done. We don't have to solve them.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:56 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by bharat.bondalapati » Sun Apr 07, 2013 3:55 am
@rintoo22
The way you solved it is completely correct. The answer has to be B.
Best,
Bharat

If you find my post helpful, please click on the 'Thank' icon.