BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS-1

Expert replies
by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon May 02, 2011 3:52 am
Lines n and p lie on the xy plane. Is the slope of line n less than slope of line p
(1) Lines n and p intersect at (5, 1)
(2) The y-intercept of line n is greater than the y intercept of p

Though this one is discussed earlier .. can someone give a better approach and confirm the answer?

Some say C and some say E.

This one appears to be a GMAT prep 700+ problem.

Experts guidance please.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kinji@BTG » Mon May 02, 2011 8:30 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Lines n and p lie on the xy plane. Is the slope of line n less than slope of line p
(1) Lines n and p intersect at (5, 1)
(2) The y-intercept of line n is greater than the y intercept of p

Though this one is discussed earlier .. can someone give a better approach and confirm the answer?

Some say C and some say E.

This one appears to be a GMAT prep 700+ problem.

Experts guidance please.
I am no expert, but I guess the answer should be C.

Both the statements, I can't determine the slope.

Combining the two, as per the diagram,
For the 1st Diagram:
if Y intercept of n > Y intercept of p, then slope of P is more in second quadrant all Tan values are -ve.
For the 2nd Diagram:

if Y intercept of n > Y intercept of p, then slope of P is again is more.
Hence C.

Image
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Mon May 02, 2011 8:35 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Lines n and p lie on the xy plane. Is the slope of line n less than slope of line p
(1) Lines n and p intersect at (5, 1)
(2) The y-intercept of line n is greater than the y intercept of p

Though this one is discussed earlier .. can someone give a better approach and confirm the answer?

Some say C and some say E.

This one appears to be a GMAT prep 700+ problem.

Experts guidance please.
Hi bubbliiiiiiii!

I'm assuming that you understood that each statement alone was insufficient (because you eliminated A, B and D from your question) - BUT I will discuss the overall approach for each statement here as well.

With regard to approach,

Step One: if you read coordinate geometry, immediately consider sketching
Step Two: this is a Yes/No question so our test for insufficiency will need to try to find BOTH a Yes and a No scenario.

Statement (1): Sketch a coordinate plane and put at point at (5,1). Now draw ANY two lines through the point (5,1) and label them N and P. Is the slope of N greater than that of P? Now swap the labels for your line (name the n line with a p now and the p line with an n). The answer just changed - Insufficient!

Statement (2): Same idea, sketch a coordinate plane and put 2 dots on the Y-axis (anywhere you want). Label the higher one N and the lower one P. Now draw 2 lines any way you want. Is the slope of your N line greater than your P line? If you answer Yes, then rotate the P line until the answer is No (and vice versa). We were able to answer BOTH Yes and No - Insufficient.

Statements (Together): Again, the idea is to use our sketch to find AN answer (either yes or no, doesn't matter). And then try to re-sketch the drawing to get the OTHER answer. So, sketch a quick coordinate plane, plot the point (5,1) and then put 2 dots on the Y-axis (anywhere you want) and label the higher one N. Draw your lines - is the slope of N less than P? Now using your 2 fingers for lines, try to keep moving the pair of lines up and down the Y-axis or further apart/closer together on the axis. Can you find a way to get N to have a GREATER slope than P? You're start to see that whatever happens, N will always be at least slightly less than P (or more negative if you have negative slopes).

So, strategy: Geometry (particularly coordinate geo) make a sketch. Yes/No DS problems, work to prove insufficiency - if you cannot, then bets are that it is sufficient.

:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by skspark » Mon May 02, 2011 9:09 am
good qs
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Mon May 02, 2011 9:29 am
hi guys
almost all is said about this problem
but i also see pure numerical approach
n=y=k1*x+b1
p=y=k2*x+b2
we need to estimate k1 vs k2
as all agree neither of the st alone are insuff, so both
1=k1*5+b1
1=k2*5+b2, equate them
k2*5+b2=k1*5+b1
5*k2-5*k1=b1-b2,
5(k2-k1)=b1-b2,
if we provide that b1-b2>0 we prove that k2-k1 also greater then 0, thus k2>k1,
2 st give us that b1>b2, and so k2>k1
C is the answer
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon May 02, 2011 9:12 pm
Thanks all and a special thanks to whitney for the beautiful explanation.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion