Need some opinion on this...

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Thanked: 1 times

Need some opinion on this...

by silivest60 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:56 pm
I think I have the solution on this, I just want to make sure that I'm not missing something....
I appreciate any feedback,
thanks a lot.


Here is how I would solve this:

the question is asking: What is n1? where n1-items Bob produced last week
Let n2-the number of items Bob produced this week

(1) says that last week: 480= (n1)x in case Bob produced less or equal to 36 items
or, 480=36x + (n1-36)1.5x, in case Bob produced more than 36 items.
Therefore not sufficient
(2) says that this week: 510 = (n1 + 2)x, in case of equal or less than 36 items,
or 510 = 36x + (n1 + 2 - 36) 1.5x, in case of over 36 items. Therefore not sufficient.
Combining (1) and (2), is still not sufficient because we don't know whether Bob produced more than 36 items or less. If we knew that than we would have had two equations with two unknown and the answer would have been (C). But in this case, we have two solutions, and therefore answer is (E)
Attachments
DS1.jpg
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:30 am
Thanked: 15 times

by sujaysolanki » Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:01 am
I dont know how much this will help but i wud have kept it simpler..

From 1 n1 x = 480

From 2 (n2 +2 ) x = 510

We do not know both n and x ..hence E seems best

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Thanked: 1 times

by silivest60 » Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:31 am
Well,
I think that because we have n2=n1+2, we'll end up in satement (2) with an equation of the same two unknowns n1 and x. And, in this case, we'd have statetment (1) and stat (2) basically two equations with two unknowns. Therefore, one might say that (1) and (2) combined are sufficient and answer (C) is correct.....so I'm not sure about this, unless you have a better explanation...
Am I correct?