BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS rent from a corporation

Expert replies
by cceci » Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:24 pm
Dear all struggling with GMAT,

in the 12th edition of the review book there is a question which answer I can't understand:

the annual rent collected by a corporation from a building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

(1) x > y
(2) xy/100 < x-y

what i don't understand is why the first statement is not sufficient (according to the answer in the book). that is my explanation:

1998 = (1+x%).1997
1998 = (1+y%).1999

since x > y it means that 1999 must be greater than 1997, so that when both years are musltiplied with the percentage we get the same value - where am I wrong? on page 329 fron the book there is another explanation i don't really understand to be honest...

i hope you can help me with my "wrong" answer :)

best regards,
Tsveti
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by niketdoshi123 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:28 am
cceci wrote:Dear all struggling with GMAT,

in the 12th edition of the review book there is a question which answer I can't understand:

the annual rent collected by a corporation from a building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

(1) x > y
(2) xy/100 < x-y

what i don't understand is why the first statement is not sufficient (according to the answer in the book). that is my explanation:

1998 = (1+x%).1997
1998 = (1+y%).1999

since x > y it means that 1999 must be greater than 1997, so that when both years are musltiplied with the percentage we get the same value - where am I wrong? on page 329 fron the book there is another explanation i don't really understand to be honest...

i hope you can help me with my "wrong" answer :)

best regards,
Tsveti
While solving DS questions always try to rephrase the question stem in its most simplified form.

Let's try rephrasing what the question is actually asking

It says , the rent collected was x% more in 1998 than in 1997

Assume the rent collected in 1997 (A)= $100,

then the rent collected in 1998 (B)= $100 + x% of $100 = 100 + x

and the rend collected was y% less in 1999 than in 1998

So rent collected in 1999 (C)= (100+x) - y% of (100+x) = 100 + x - y - x*y/100

Question asked : was the annual rent collected more in 1999 than in 1997
=> was C - A > 0

=> Is (100 + x - y - x*y/100) - (100) > 0
=> Is x - y > x*y/100

From statement 1 we know that x - y > 0 , but (x - y) can be greater than or less than x*y/100. Hence this statement is not sufficient

Statement 2 clearly states that x - y is greater than x*y/100. Hence it is sufficient to answer our rephrased question.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:40 am
cceci wrote: the annual rent collected by a corporation from a building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

(1) x > y
(2) xy/100 < x-y
Let the 1997 rent = 100.
Increase in 1998 = (x/100)*100 = x.
Rent in 1998 = 100+x.
Decrease in 1999 = y/100*(100+x) = y + xy/100
The problem asks whether the increase is greater than the decrease.

Question rephrased: Is x > y + xy/100?

Statement 1: x > y
If x=20 and y=10, then y + xy/100 = 10 + (20*10)/100 = 12.
Is 20 > 12? Yes.

If x=90 and y=80, then y + xy/100 = 80 + (90*80)/100 = 152.
Is 90 > 152? No.
Since the answer in the first case is YES, and the answer in the second case is NO, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x-y > xy/100
Thus, x > y + xy/100.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.

It is helpful to be able to recognize the following formulas for repeated percent change:

If a value increases by x% and then by another y%, the total percent change = x + y + xy/100.
If a value increases by x% and then decreases by y%, the total percent change = x - y - xy/100.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion