JIM EARNS X

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:33 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

JIM EARNS X

by rommysingh » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:31 pm
If Jim earns x dollars per hour, it will take him 4 hours to earn exactly enough money to purchase a particular jacket. If Tom earns y dollars per hour, it will take him exactly 5 hours to earn enough money to purchase the same jacket. How much does the jacket cost?

(1) Tom makes 20% less per hour than Jim does.

(2) x + y = $43.75
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:51 pm
This question uses a classic GMAT trick of giving in a statement essentially the same information that was already given in the question.
,
In the question we are given 5y = 4x. So y/x = 4/5 or y = 4x/5. In other words y = .8x.

Statement 1 says that Tom makes 20% less than Jim does. Well Hello! y = .8x then. We already knew that, and Statement 1 is insufficient, unnecessary, and basically useless.

So either Statement 2 is sufficient or the answer is E.

Statement 2 says that x + y = 43.75. Since we know that y = .8x, we could substitute .8x for y and solve for x, at which point we could multiply by 4 to get the cost of the jacket.

Of course this is a DS problem. So there's no need to do that calculating. We just need to know that we could.

So Statement 2 is sufficient and the answer is B.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Wed Aug 05, 2015 10:19 pm
Hi rommysingh,

This question has a slight 'bias' in it that leaves it slightly open to interpretation, which I'll get to in a moment.

From the prompt, we're given 2 rates:
1) JIM: (4 hours)(X dollars per hour) = 4X = ENOUGH money to purchase a jacket.
2) TOM: (5 hours)(Y dollars per hour) = 5Y = ENOUGH money to purchase the same jacket.

I believe that the original author of this question wants us to assume that the cost of the jacket is 4X (which is the same as 5Y). Stating that 4X is ENOUGH money to buy the jacket could be interpreted as meaning "the jacket costs 4X OR LESS"). I'm going to assume that the jacked DOES cost 4X (= 5Y).

Knowing that 4X = 5Y gives us a relationship between the two variables (which means that we might have a 'system' of equations; we might also be able to TEST VALUES). We're asked for the price of the jacket.

Fact 1: Tom makes 20% less per hour than Jim does.

This Fact is redundant information, but even if you don't realize that, by TESTING VALUES, you can prove that it leads to an infinite number of possible jacket prices....

IF....
X = 5
Y = 4
Then the price of the jacket is $20

IF....
X = 10
Y = 8
Then the price of the jacket is $40

IF....
X = 15
Y = 12
Then the price of the jacket is $60
Etc.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X + Y = $43.75

This Fact gives us a second equation to work with (the first equation was 4X = 5Y). With 2 variables and 2 unique equations, we CAN solve for X and Y. Knowing that, we don't actually have to do the work - we could figure out the price of the jacket though.

If you're curious, here's one way that you could do the math using the 2 equations...

X = 43.75 - Y

4X = 5Y
4(43.75 - Y) = 5Y
175 - 4Y = 5Y
175 = 9Y
175/9 = Y

Thus, 5Y = 5(175/9)
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image