BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Set 10 Q13

Expert replies
by arocks » Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:53 am
If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?
(1) x > y + 4
(2) -5x < -14y

I think the answer is B. The OA is D.

Stmt2
-5x<-14y or 5x>14y or 2.5x>7y
So stmt2 is suff.

stmt1 - Not sure how statement1 is useful?
Pls explain. Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by samirpandeyit62 » Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:41 am
If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?

(1) x > y + 4

here if y =2 then x =6 & 3x>7y

y =3 then x =7 so 3x =7y

but if y is greater than 4 then 3x<4y

Hnece this cannot be sufficeint

2) -5x < -14y

i.e 5x > 14y

so we have 2.5x>7y

so suff

Ans should be B
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:27 am
arocks wrote:If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?
(1) x > y + 4
(2) -5x < -14y

I think the answer is B. The OA is D.

Stmt2
-5x<-14y or 5x>14y or 2.5x>7y
So stmt2 is suff.

stmt1 - Not sure how statement1 is useful?
Pls explain. Thanks.
x > y + 4
Put Y = 0,1,2...
x>4, x>5 , x>6..so on
Put y=0.5
x>4.5

We need to find out : (y/n)
is 3x > 7y?
x>(7/3)y ---- x>2.3 y

for y=0
x>0,
Stmt 1 says x>4 and querstion : Is x > 0... Ans YES

for y=0.5
x> (23/5)y
x> 4.6 y

Stmt 1 is x>4.5 and Question is X > 4.6 y

Answer NO

Therfore B

is the OA
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:29 pm
mmslf75 wrote:
arocks wrote:If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?
(1) x > y + 4
(2) -5x < -14y

I think the answer is B. The OA is D.

Stmt2
-5x<-14y or 5x>14y or 2.5x>7y
So stmt2 is suff.

stmt1 - Not sure how statement1 is useful?
Pls explain. Thanks.
x > y + 4
Put Y = 0,1,2...
x>4, x>5 , x>6..so on
Put y=0.5
x>4.5

We need to find out : (y/n)
is 3x > 7y?
x>(7/3)y ---- x>2.3 y

for y=0
x>0,
Stmt 1 says x>4 and querstion : Is x > 0... Ans YES

for y=0.5
x> (23/5)y
x> 4.6 y

Stmt 1 is x>4.5 and Question is X > 4.6 y

Answer NO

Therfore B

is the OA
Some creative math here!

Everyone is ok with (2), so let's just focus on (1).

We know that x and y are both positive, so we can only select positive values (i.e. not y=0).
We also know that x > y + 4

We want to know whether 3x > 7y.

Let's try a really small y and a really big y and see if it matters.

If y = 1, then x > 5. Let's make x as small as possible, 5.000001.

Is 3(5.0000001) > 7(1)? YES.

If y = 1000, then x > 1004. Let's make x as small as possible, 1004.0000001.

Is 3(1004.000001) > 7(1000)? NO.

Since (1) can produce both a YES and a NO, it's insufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:34 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:
arocks wrote:If x and y are positive, is 3x > 7y?
(1) x > y + 4
(2) -5x < -14y

I think the answer is B. The OA is D.

Stmt2
-5x<-14y or 5x>14y or 2.5x>7y
So stmt2 is suff.

stmt1 - Not sure how statement1 is useful?
Pls explain. Thanks.
x > y + 4
Put Y = 0,1,2...
x>4, x>5 , x>6..so on
Put y=0.5
x>4.5

We need to find out : (y/n)
is 3x > 7y?
x>(7/3)y ---- x>2.3 y

for y=0
x>0,
Stmt 1 says x>4 and querstion : Is x > 0... Ans YES

for y=0.5
x> (23/5)y
x> 4.6 y

Stmt 1 is x>4.5 and Question is X > 4.6 y

Answer NO

Therfore B

is the OA
Some creative math here!

Everyone is ok with (2), so let's just focus on (1).

We know that x and y are both positive, so we can only select positive values (i.e. not y=0).
We also know that x > y + 4

We want to know whether 3x > 7y.

Let's try a really small y and a really big y and see if it matters.

If y = 1, then x > 5. Let's make x as small as possible, 5.000001.

Is 3(5.0000001) > 7(1)? YES.

If y = 1000, then x > 1004. Let's make x as small as possible, 1004.0000001.

Is 3(1004.000001) > 7(1000)? NO.

Since (1) can produce both a YES and a NO, it's insufficient.

That was great...!! Thanks stuart..

I like the way u used 5.00000001 and 1004.000001 ..wow !
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:50 am
I do it this way:

stmt # 1: x > y + 4
=> x-y > 4

lets take x=9, y=4 3x = 27 < 7y = 28
so, 9-4 > 4

lets take x=9, y=2 3x = 27 > 7y = 14
so, 9-2 > 4

Thus stmt # 1 is INSUFFICIENT. (Q.E.D - Quadrat Errat Demonstrandum :)
Join the discussion