BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ds:is x^2>5^2?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by HSPA » Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:46 am
Using A : magnitude of x is either 10 or 2.5 [insufficient]
using B : magnitude of x can be 4,5 or more [insufficeitn]

Combining:
magnitude of x is 10

IMO C
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:02 am
from 1st we get to know that x<5
from second we know that x>3 and x<-3

when we combine we get to know the range of x i.e -5<x<-3 and 3<x<5
thus NO
imo c

is this correct?
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:04 am
It should be C.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:10 am
can you please explain how is it c?
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:16 am
HSPA wrote:using B : magnitude of x can be 4,5 or more [insufficeitn]
Just to add to it, x can also be -4, -5, -6 ..

@Arjunshn, HSPA has describe it nice.

Hope it helps.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:23 am
what abt the first option..is my explanation right?
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:30 am
I am not sure how you concluded x<5 from option 1.

My approach was to square on both sides to obtain a qudratic equation of x.

Then solve for x to get 5/2 and -10.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:33 am
i took three intervals for the 1st equation x<-5, -5<x<5 and x>5
when u put the values on the number line only first two satisfy thus x<5
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:34 am
arjunshn wrote:from 1st we get to know that x<5
from second we know that x>3 and x<-3

when we combine we get to know the range of x i.e -5<x<-3 and 3<x<5
thus NO
imo c

is this correct?
The two scenario approach is useful for equations using absolute values.
The equation has two solutions, which can be found using the two scenarios:

scenario 1: Copy the equation as is, without the absolute value. Solve.
X -5 = 3(X + 5)
x-5 = 3x+15
-5-15 = 3x-x
-20 = 2x
-10=x

Scenario 2: copy the equation without the absolute value sign, but put a (-) minus sign on one the right side.
X -5 = -3(X + 5)
x-5 = -3x-15
2x = -10
x=-2.5

As a final step for the two scenario approach, check your work by plugging in both values into the original equation |X -5| = 3 |X + 5| to see that the equation is indeed satisfied for both values:

x=-10 |-10 -5| = 3 |-10 + 5|
|-15| = 3|-5|
15 is indeed equal to 3*5.

x=-2.5 |-2.5 -5| = 3 |-2.5 + 5|
|-7.5| = 3|-2.5|
7.5 is indeed equal to 3*2.5.

So both of these values satisfy the equation, and are thus the solutions of x.

Alone, this is insufficient to answer the question: For x^2 to be greater than 5^2, x must be either >5 or smaller than -5.
-10 is smaller than -5, so the answer here is YES.
-2.5 is greater than -5, so the answer is NO.

Stat. (2) is insufficient for the same reasoning: it is possible to find examples that are both within and outside the required ranges.

combined, only x=-10 satisfies Stat. (2)'s requirements, so the answer to the question is a definite YES. Answer is C.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:43 am
thank you
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:19 am
arjunshn wrote:Is X^2 > 5^2 ?
1) |X -5| = 3 |X + 5|
2) |X| > 3
Taking into account that |a-b| = dist(a,b) for any two real numbers a and b (where dist means the distance in the real number line), please note that:

The question may be rephrased as: |x| > 5, that is, is dist(x, origin) greater than 5?

(1) dist(x,5) = 3*dist(x, -5)

Please note (diagram follows) that there are ONLY TWO points (real numbers) satisfying this statement, one of them certainly answering the question in the affirmative, the other one in the negative.

From sttm (2) we must "take out" one of the (only two) possibilities allowed by sttm (1), therefore we are done.

Regards,
Fabio.

Image
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by arjunshn » Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:27 am
Its a great way to solve it faster..basically a shortcut or basic logic.
thanx alot for sharing it..
thank you
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:41 am
arjunshn wrote:Its a great way to solve it faster..basically a shortcut or basic logic.
thanx alot for sharing it..
thank you
I´m glad you like it, arjunshn!
Cheers, Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion