BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Slopes DS

Expert replies
by rahulvsd » Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:23 am
Line a is defined by the equation y = mx + 4.

Line b is defined the the equation y = px - 2.

If these lines intersect at point C, is either m or p greater than 0?

(1) The x intercept of line b < 0.

(2) | m | > | p |

OA: E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:51 am
We need to find if either of the lines have a +ve slope.

Both the statements do not provide info to conclude the line has a +ve slope. E IMO
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:25 am
statement 1 tells nothing about the slope of b
statement 2 compares absolute values of slope. Nothing can be derived from that either.
Both these statements are hence insufficient. So, A,B and D are out.
Combining the two statements also leads to nothing. C is out.

Answer: E.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sat Nov 12, 2011 11:42 am
parul9 wrote:statement 1 tells nothing about the slope of b
statement 2 compares absolute values of slope. Nothing can be derived from that either.
Both these statements are hence insufficient. So, A,B and D are out.
Combining the two statements also leads to nothing. C is out.

Answer: E.
I disagree with the bold, red statement above.
From the original equation (y = px - 2), we know the y-intercept is negative.
Also, from (1) we know x-intercept is negative. So, both facts imply p(slope)
is NEGATIVE.

Thus, we can respond to the question: "is m or p > 0?"
No, p is NOT > 0

Other opinions please.
Join the discussion

by bpdulog » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:47 pm
gmatdriller wrote:
parul9 wrote:statement 1 tells nothing about the slope of b
statement 2 compares absolute values of slope. Nothing can be derived from that either.
Both these statements are hence insufficient. So, A,B and D are out.
Combining the two statements also leads to nothing. C is out.

Answer: E.
I disagree with the bold, red statement above.
From the original equation (y = px - 2), we know the y-intercept is negative.
Also, from (1) we know x-intercept is negative. So, both facts imply p(slope)
is NEGATIVE.

Thus, we can respond to the question: "is m or p > 0?"
No, p is NOT > 0

Other opinions please.
I think he is right actually. All that tells us is that line b cuts through (-2,-2) but doesn't tell us what the slope of the line is.
NO EXCUSES

"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:42 am
@bpdulog:
"I think he is right actually. All that tells us is that line b cuts through (-2,-2) but doesn't tell us what the slope of the line is.
Line b: y = px - 2: the line cuts y-axis at y = -2
From y = px - 2, we know that it cuts y-axis at (0,-2)
The x intercept of line b < 0. : same line cuts x-axis at x < 0
Example: on x-axis we may get (-1,0), (-2,0) on line b since line b cuts x-axis at a negative value.

Pls view the attached.
[/img]
Attachments
line b.pptx
(38.1 KiB) Downloaded 148 times
Join the discussion