Greatest Common Factor

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:29 pm
alex.gellatly wrote:What is the greatest common factor of the positive integers j and k?

1) k = j+1
2) jk is divisible by 5
Statement 1: j and k are consecutive positive integers.
Hence, only common factor of j and k is 1.

Sufficient

Statement 2: Consider the following cases,
j = 1, k = 5 --> GCF = 1
j = 5, k = 5 --> GCF = 5

Not sufficient

The correct answer is A.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:11 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:7 members

by tutorphd » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:24 am
The important thing to understand here is why consecutive numbers j and j+1 do not have any other common factors except -1 and 1.

Let's take a factor of j, call it n, and try to divide j+1 by it:

(j+1)/n = j/n + 1/n

j/n is integer since n is a factor of j BUT 1/n is never integer EXCEPT when n = +/- 1. The result j/n + 1/n will be integer only for n = +/- 1 which means j+1 is divisible by a factor of j only when that factor is n = +/- 1.

Similar logic can be applied to the integers j and j+2. The only common factors they will have are +/- 1 and +/- 2.
Skype / Chicago quant tutor in GMAT / GRE
https://gmat.tutorchicago.org/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:16 members

by alex.gellatly » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:46 am
tutorphd wrote:The important thing to understand here is why consecutive numbers j and j+1 do not have any other common factors except -1 and 1.

Let's take a factor of j, call it n, and try to divide j+1 by it:

(j+1)/n = j/n + 1/n

j/n is integer since n is a factor of j BUT 1/n is never integer EXCEPT when n = +/- 1. The result j/n + 1/n will be integer only for n = +/- 1 which means j+1 is divisible by a factor of j only when that factor is n = +/- 1.

Similar logic can be applied to the integers j and j+2. The only common factors they will have are +/- 1 and +/- 2.
Thanks. You made it clear. Can this logic also be applied to the integers j and j+3 and j and j+n (when n is a prime)?