BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

absolute value computation

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:14 pm
Hi utkalnayak,

This DS question is worded in a very specific way and has a number of interesting Number Properties that you can take advantage of.

We're asked if |X| < 1. This is a YES/NO question.

The wording of this question is interesting in that the types of numbers that would give you a YES answer are "limited" - only positive/negative FRACTIONS or the number 0 would give you a YES; all other possibilities would give you a NO. This gets me thinking that I will have to consider possibilities that are fractions.

Fact 1: |X+1| = 2|X-1|

Since this is an equation that involves absolute values, chances are that there are 2 solutions.

IF.....
X = 3, then the answer to the question is NO.

Remember what I noted about fractions earlier....
IF....
X = 1/3, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: |X-3| > 0

This inequality excludes ONLY 1 value of X: 3
X CANNOT be 3....

IF....
X = 4, then the answer to the question is NO.

IF....
X = 1/3, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know....
X is either 3 or 1/3
X CANNOT be 3
This leaves us with just one answer (1/3) and the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.

Final Answer: C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:48 pm
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0
Statement 1: |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
Case 1: No signs changed
x+1 = 2(x-1)
x+1 = 2x - 2
3 = x.

Case 2: Signs changed in ONE of the absolute values
-(x+1) = 2(x-1)
-x-1 = 2x - 2
-3x = -1
x = 1/3.

Since |x|>1 in Case 1 but |x|<1 in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x - 3| > 0
Case 3: No signs changed
x-3 > 0
x > 3

Case 4: Signs changed in the absolute value
-(x-3) > 0
-x + 3 > 0
-x > -3
x < 3.

The resulting inequalities -- x<3 or x>3 -- imply that x≠3.
If x=0, then |x|<1.
If x=10, then |x|>1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Statement 1 requires that x=3 or x=1/3.
Statement 2 requires that x≠3.
Thus, x=1/3, with the result that |x| < 1.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:51 am
utkalnayak wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0
Alternate approach:

Question stem, rephrased:
Is x between -1 and 1?

|a-b| = the distance between a and b.
|a+b| = |a - (-b)| = the distance between a and -b.

Statement 1: |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
|x - (-1)| = 2|x-1|.
In words:
The distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1.

Case 1: x is BETWEEN -1 AND 1
-1.........0...x......1
Here, the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1.

Case 2: x is to the RIGHT OF 1
-1.........0.........1..................x
Here, the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1

Since x is between -1 and 1 in Case 1 but to the right of 1 in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x - 3| > 0
In words:
The distance between x and 3 is greater than 0.
Implication:
x can be ANY OTHER VALUE THAN 3, with the result that the distance between x and 3 will be greater than 0.
Since it's possible that x is between -1 and 1 or NOT between -1 and 1, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Always consider how the two statements might AFFECT EACH OTHER.
Statement 2 indicates x≠3.
In the number line for Case 2, x is to the right of 1 and might be equal to 3.
My suspicion:
The value that yields Case 2 is x=3.

Plugging x=3 into |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|, we get:
|3 + 1| = 2|3 - 1|
4 = 4.
Implication: The value that yields Case 2 is x=3.
Since statement 2 indicates that x≠3, Case 2 is not possible.

Thus, only Case 1 is possible, implying that x is between -1 and 1.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:58 am
Another algebraic trick is remembering that |x| = √x², and here it seems to make the question much easier.

|x| < 1 is equivalent to √x² < 1, or x² < 1, or -1 < x < 1. So the REAL question is "Is 1 > x > -1 ?"

S1 gives us

√(x+1)² = 2√(x-1)²
(x + 1)² = 4(x - 1)²
x² + 2x + 1 = 4(x² - 2x + 1)
x² + 2x + 1 = 4x² - 8x + 4
0 = 3x² - 10x + 3
0 = (3x - 1)(x - 3)

So x = 1/3 or x = 3. If x = 1/3, then 1 > x > -1, but if x = 3, x > 1, so this is INSUFFICIENT.

S2 gives us

√(x-3)² > 0
(x - 3)² > 0
x > 3 or 3 > x; in other words, x is NOT 3. This is INSUFFICIENT too.

Together, we know that x = 1/3, so we're set!
Join the discussion