DS Princeton Review Bin 3 Q9

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

DS Princeton Review Bin 3 Q9

by givemeanid » Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:44 pm
If P is a set of integers and 3 is in P, is every positive multiple of 3 in P?

(1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P
(2) For any integer in P, that integer minus 3 is also in P
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:06 pm

by Jhyphi » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:17 pm
I'm going with A.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:38 am
Followed by:1 members

by discreet » Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:26 am
Yes,appears to be A.Here's my explanation:

Its given that 3 is in P,

(1) =>
3+3,3+6,3+9,....are all in P.If an integer is in P,then 3+that integer is also in P.So,it has to be an infinite set to satisfy this condition.To conclude,all positive multiples of 3 must be in P.

(2)=>

Using this we can conclude that All negative mutliples of 3 are in P but we cannot say that all positive multiples of 3 are in P.

any other views???

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by givemeanid » Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:47 am
The OA is (A).

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:58 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by aninditasivaram2406 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:31 pm
Option 2 will not be the correct answer. This is because if the number 3 is in the set, then 3-0=0 is also in the set. Ans 0 is not a multiple of 3...hope this sounds logical