aspire750 wrote:nik08 wrote:A data sufficiency question :
Set S contains more than one element. Is the range of the set S larger than its mean?
1) Set S does not conatin positive elements
2) the median of set S is negative
Can someone please explain ?
Thanks in adv!
2) the median of set S is negative- if median of a set is known, the mean of the set equals median. Sufficient
No, the median does not normally equal the mean. The median and mean are sometimes equal- if you have an evenly spaced set, for example, or a symmetrically distributed set- but if you don't know anything about the set, you certainly can't conclude anything about the relationship between the mean and the median. The median of the following set is 1:
{0, 1, 10000000000000000}
but the mean is much larger than 1.
The answer should be C, although A is very, very close to being sufficient.
If we knew that all the elements were negative, we would know that the mean was negative. Since the range of a set can't be negative, if a set only contains negative elements, the range must be larger than the mean. But, that's not quite what Statement 1 says. From 1, it's certainly possible that every element in the set is equal to zero. Then the range is zero and the mean is zero; the mean doesn't need to be smaller than the range.
From 1+2 together, we know the set contains at least one negative element, and does not contain any positive elements, so it must have a negative mean, and therefore the range is larger than the mean.
