iS a < B?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:07 am
OA A?

1) cubes dont change the sign of a and b.

a ^ 3 = 1
b ^ 3 = 8
a = 1 , b = 2

a ^ 3 = -1
b ^ 3 = -1/8
a = -1 , b = -1/2

It holds for all values.

2) not sufficient,
squares can change the sign. So a and b can be positive or negative.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:38 am
vineeshp wrote:OA A?

1) cubes dont change the sign of a and b.

a ^ 3 = 1
b ^ 3 = 8
a = 1 , b = 2

a ^ 3 = -1
b ^ 3 = -1/8
a = -1 , b = -1/2

It holds for all values.

2) not sufficient,
squares can change the sign. So a and b can be positive or negative.
why did you consider that example in bold?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:53 am

by umesh321 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:13 am
sanju09 wrote:Is the integer a less than the integer b?

(1) a^3 < b^3.

(2) a^2 < b^2.



https://www.testprepreview.com
{a^3-b^3}< 0
(a-b)(a^2+b^2-ab)<0
(a-b)(a^2+b^2-ab)<0

since [a^2+b^2]/2>ab
thus a<b

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:18 am
sanju09 wrote:
vineeshp wrote:OA A?

1) cubes dont change the sign of a and b.

a ^ 3 = 1
b ^ 3 = 8
a = 1 , b = 2

a ^ 3 = -1
b ^ 3 = -1/8
a = -1 , b = -1/2

It holds for all values.

2) not sufficient,
squares can change the sign. So a and b can be positive or negative.
why did you consider that example in bold?
Actually, I was just verifying that for negative values greater than -1, there are no loopholes.
Have I made a mistake somewhere?
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:15 am
vineeshp wrote:
sanju09 wrote:
vineeshp wrote:OA A?

1) cubes dont change the sign of a and b.

a ^ 3 = 1
b ^ 3 = 8
a = 1 , b = 2

a ^ 3 = -1
b ^ 3 = -1/8
a = -1 , b = -1/2

It holds for all values.

2) not sufficient,
squares can change the sign. So a and b can be positive or negative.
why did you consider that example in bold?
Actually, I was just verifying that for negative values greater than -1, there are no loopholes.
Have I made a mistake somewhere?
If the question calls a and b as integers, how can we possibly consider b = -1/2 in any case?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:50 pm

by arjunshn » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:22 am
hey can some one help with the previous topic

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:32 am
Oops! I dint read the word integer there! :S
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)