BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Tenses please explain

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:2 members

Tenses please explain

by hey_thr67 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:26 am
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

A: would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B: took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
C: would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D: would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E: took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be


OA is D. Why not B
Last edited by hey_thr67 on Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:20 am
B uses the simple past tense "took", which could lead to interpretation errors. We already have "was" (born) as a past tense verb, so it could sound like the dictionary was completed and born at the same time.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 307
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:45 pm
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:700

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:48 am
I think this problem is worthy of more discussion.
Let me tell you something you already know. The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It is a very mean and nasty place and it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done. Now, if you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hit, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you are because of him, or her, or anybody. Cowards do that and that ain't you. You're better than that! (Rocky VI)
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:19 am

by GMAT_2010_2707 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:14 pm
Hi,

I would request an expert to kindly explain this.

We need to understand -

So in a sentence where series of action took place in past and the earliest action is in simple past tense - how do we handle the successive actions?

Thanks,
NM
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:08 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by jimmyjimmy » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:54 am
Gaurav 2013-fall wrote:I think this problem is worthy of more discussion.
nice quote..buddy (the seven lines rainbows and sunshine)
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:00 am
Thanked: 4 times

by rajcools » Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:31 pm
read Stacey's explanation
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/in- ... -t421.html
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1