BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep : CR 3

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by this_time_i_will » Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:22 am
the first thing is to identify the conclusion.
The conclusion of this argument is: a high fee will alleviate the city traffic congestion.

So any option that says that people are willing to pay extra money, will weaken the argument (i.e. weaken the conclusion).

B says that parking cost already makes it costlier for people to use private vehicle than bus.so people are already paying more than bus for using their private vehicle. So a further increase of 5 $ wud not add much to people woes.

Note that considerably more expensive >> 5$.


D: Many does not means majority.
Join the discussion