-
aditya8062
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
1]People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
2]Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts.
3]Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
4]Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
5]Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those along the waterfront.
my concern: the proclaimed answer to this question is B. i feel there can be argument both ways while considering B as answer. for instance B is ALREADY mentioned in the argument so effectively it is not adding anything to the argument.
The passage mentions:Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front ------------>this fact is reiterated in option B (after all, "waterfront properties are in traditionally industrial or commercial districts AND when the passage is saying that "large sum being paid" then THAT definitely means that this LARGE sum is being paid by BUYERS)
D, on the other hand, tells us as why the "cost" of this entire development might come down and hence will increase the profit of developers
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?
1]People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.
2]Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts.
3]Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.
4]Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.
5]Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those along the waterfront.
my concern: the proclaimed answer to this question is B. i feel there can be argument both ways while considering B as answer. for instance B is ALREADY mentioned in the argument so effectively it is not adding anything to the argument.
The passage mentions:Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front ------------>this fact is reiterated in option B (after all, "waterfront properties are in traditionally industrial or commercial districts AND when the passage is saying that "large sum being paid" then THAT definitely means that this LARGE sum is being paid by BUYERS)
D, on the other hand, tells us as why the "cost" of this entire development might come down and hence will increase the profit of developers
