commerce depart

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:05 pm

commerce depart

by sq720 » Mon May 18, 2009 7:03 pm
The commerce Department announced that the economy grew during the second quarter at a 7.5 percent annual rate, while inflation eased when it might have been expected for it to rise.
A.) it might have been expected for it to rise
B.) it might have been expected to rise
C.) it might have been expected that it should rise
D.) its rise might have been expected
E.) there might have been an expectation it would rise.

Why is D wrong and B correct
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:16 pm
Location: India

by Mayur Sand » Mon May 18, 2009 7:32 pm
(B) is correct choice, "expected to" is correct idiom usuage

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Tue May 19, 2009 2:43 am
D is wrong because no paralelism.

this kind of paralelism involve not only form but also where paralel elements are placed.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Wed May 27, 2009 10:40 am
Received a PM asking me to explain why D is wrong. I'm curious - where did this problem come from?

There's something of a clarity of meaning issue here. We could also call it "that's just the way we say it in English," which is not very GMAT-like. This doesn't seem like a very well-written problem to me.

First, clarity of meaning:

Something went down when it might have been expected to go up. When you phrase it this way, it's very clear that the "went down" and "to go up" (both forms of verbs) both apply to the original subject, "something."
"inflation eased (an action) when it (inflation) might have been expected to rise (an alternate action)"

In D, "rise" is a noun, not a verb, which is the first thing that muddles the meaning. The rise of what? What rose or could have been expected to rise? We have a pronoun beforehand: its. So "its rise" - what does "its" refer to? Probably inflation. But it doesn't have the nice parallelism that choice B has, so B is better than D.

But, again, it's not very GMAT-like to have to rely on that reasoning to get to the answer. The test-writers are interested in knowing whether you know the grammar, not whether you know how native speakers would prefer to word something.

Personally, I wouldn't study this one.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:56 pm
this is the official question from OG 10

I agree that we should study the good questions only. Pls, pay attention to this or we loose time and energy

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:17 am
Does this question not show up in either OG11 or OG12? A couple of years ago, GMAC said at a meeting that they were trying to eliminate verbal questions that gave a clear advantage to native speakers - content that would more likely be known by native speakers, which includes more obscure things for which we'd say "that's just the way we prefer to say it in English." So I'm guessing that this one has not been used after OG10 and this is why.

Note that we are talking about an idiomatic construction here but this is different than idioms for which we can set a simple, definitive rule (use this preposition after this word, etc.). The "simpler" idioms are ones which non-native speakers can be expected to learn. The more complex ones, where entire clauses are written a certain way "just because" - that starts to introduce a bias in favor of the native speakers.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

• Page 1 of 1