BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Explain please

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pmFollowed by: 252 members
Thanked: 653 times

by papgust » Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:24 am
gmater29 wrote:Is x > k?
(1) 2^x "¢ 2^k = 4
(2) 9^x "¢ 3^k = 81
IMO, it should be E.

1) 2^x * 2^k = 4
2^(x+k) = 2^2
x+k = 2

Insufficient.

2) 9^x * 3^k = 81
3^2x * 3^k = 3^4
3^(2x+k) = 3^4
2x+k = 4

Insufficient.

Combining, solve the 2 eqns simultaneously
But you get two k values here. x=2,
and k=2 if you sub in 1st eqn, and k=0 if you sub in 2nd eqn.

Insufficient.

Hence E. Correct me if i'm wrong in any step
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:04 pm

by whuannou » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:37 am
I think it is C instead because you have 2 equations so you can set up a system of 2 equations with 2 unknown vars.

And it gives you x=2 and k = 0

Do you agree ?
Last edited by whuannou on Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Somewhere on the way
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:53 pm

by adamsmith2009 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:17 am
I think it's C

A) 2^x * 2^k = 4
Combine both statements: 2^(x+k) = 4. X can be 0, K can be 2 or X can be 2 or K can be zero. Not sufficient

2) 9^x * 3^k = 81. Simplify: 3^2x * 3^k = 81 so 3^(2x+k) = 81. So 2x+k = 4. X can be 2, K can be 0 or X can be 1, K can be 2 or X can be 0, K can be 4. Not sufficient.


If we combine and solve for two equations: x+k = 2 and 2x+k = 4 then X = 0 and K = 2. Sufficient.

What's the OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Singapore

by gmater29 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:20 pm
OA C

Thanks all
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:05 pm
adamsmith2009 wrote:I think it's C

A) 2^x * 2^k = 4
Combine both statements: 2^(x+k) = 4. X can be 0, K can be 2 or X can be 2 or K can be zero. Not sufficient

2) 9^x * 3^k = 81. Simplify: 3^2x * 3^k = 81 so 3^(2x+k) = 81. So 2x+k = 4. X can be 2, K can be 0 or X can be 1, K can be 2 or X can be 0, K can be 4. Not sufficient.


If we combine and solve for two equations: x+k = 2 and 2x+k = 4 then X = 0 and K = 2. Sufficient.

What's the OA?
If we multiply x + k = 2 by -1 and subtract it from 2x + k = 4 shouldn't x be 2 and k =0 after
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pmFollowed by: 252 members
Thanked: 653 times

by papgust » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:09 pm
You are right. It should be x=2 and k=0. But anyway it doesn't matter for data sufficiency. Had it been a problem solving question, then it matters
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:16 pm
papgust wrote:You are right. It should be x=2 and k=0. But anyway it doesn't matter for data sufficiency. Had it been a problem solving question, then it matters

I agree that it doesn't matter here. Only wanted to make sure i was solving simultaneous equations correctly. Thanks for responding.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:53 pm

by adamsmith2009 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Yes - my mistake - X = 2 K = 0
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1