BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Data Sufficiency question from Manhattan GMAT CAT

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

Data Sufficiency question from Manhattan GMAT CAT

by tomada » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:30 pm
I purchased 6 CATs through the Manhattan GMAT website. This Data Sufficiency question comes from one such test.
My answer conflicts with the answer provided by Manhattan GMAT and, after reviewing my logic multiple times, I'm still not able to see why my answer is incorrect. I won't post the answer given by Manhattan GMAT until a few people comment.


Is the product st negative?

(1) s2 - s < 0
(2) (s-4)/(t-3) = 1
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:47 pm
tomada wrote: Is the product st negative?

(1) s² - s < 0
(2) (s-4)/(t-3) = 1
Target question: Is the product st negative?

Statement 1: s² - s < 0
No information about t, so there's no way to determine whether or not st is negative.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: (s-4)/(t-3) = 1
This means that s - 4 = t - 3
Rearrange to get: t = s - 1
There are several values of s and t that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: s = 4 and t = 3, in which case st is positive
Case b: s = 0.5 and t = -0.5, in which case st is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that s² - s < 0
Factor to get: s(s - 1) < 0

From statement 2, we determined that t = s - 1

So, let's take s(s - 1) < 0 and replace (s - 1) with t to get: s < t
So, st must be negative
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:48 pm
For s*t to be negative, either s or t must be negative.

From statement 1:

s^2 - s < 0

s^2 < s

If squaring s gives you a smaller value, then s must be a positive fraction less than 1. Since we don't know anything about t, we don't know if the product is negative. Insufficient

From statement 2:

(s-4)/(t-3) = 1

s - 4 = t - 3

s = t + 1

We can get a positive product (if t=3 and s=4, for example) or a negative product ( t= -1/2 and s = 1/2) here, so it is also insufficient.

Together:

If 0 < s < 1, and s = t + 1, then 0 < t+1 < 1, or -1 < t < 0. Thus, s is a positive fraction, t is a negative fraction, and s*t is negative. Sufficient.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:50 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Statement 2: (s-4)/(t-3) = 1
This means that s - 4 = t - 3
Rearrange to get: t = s - 1
There are several values of s and t that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: s = 4 and t = 3, in which case st is positive
Case b: s = 0.5 and t = -0.5, in which case st is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Ha, those are the exact values I tested. Great minds and all that :D
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:08 pm
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote: Ha, those are the exact values I tested. Great minds and all that :D
Perhaps we were separated at birth?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:20 pm
I thank both of you for responding and for highlighting the mistake I made. I proceeded from a baseless assumption that 'S' and 'T' were integers. When I saw the values "-1/2" and "1/2" to show how the product could be negative, I emitted a silently potent "ohhhhhh".
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:24 pm
tomada wrote:I thank both of you for responding and for highlighting the mistake I made. I proceeded from a baseless assumption that 'S' and 'T' were integers. When I saw the values "-1/2" and "1/2" to show how the product could be negative, I emitted a silently potent "ohhhhhh".
Trust me, I know that feeling :D Once you get burned a few times, you start to catch those little twists in the wording. DS questions are very deliberate and consistent with the terminology used.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1