Martha bought an armchair and a coffee table

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:52 am
Say you have a1 as the buying price for the armchair and a2 as the selling price. The gross profit will be:

a2 - a1

Similarly, if you consider c1 the buying price of the coffee table and c2 its selling price, the gross profit from this transaction will be:

c2 - c1.

You are trying to establish some sort of relationship between the two profits.

1. tells you that a1 = 110% * c1 or that a1 = 1.1c1. This is insufficient to answer the question, however, since we don't have any info on a2 and c2.

2. means that a2 = 120% * c2 or that a2 = 1.2c2. This time around, no info about the buying prices.

Put both stmts together to get that:
a2 - a1 = 1.2c2 - 1.1c1 = 1.1c2 + 0.1c2 - 1.1c1 = 1.1(c2 - c1) + 0.1c2.

As you can see, you get that a2 - a1 = 1.1(c2 - c1) + 0.1c2. So, the gross profit from the armchair transaction is 1.1 times the gross profit from the coffee table transaction PLUS 0.1c2. Since we don't know c2, then we can't answer the question.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:04 pm

by alexdallas » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:05 pm
tks bro.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:13 pm
Location: India
GMAT Score:640

by nk_81 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:35 pm
For this question...would it be fair to assume since we are unable to create a satisfactory equation..... E should be the answer?
NK