BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The region in southern Asia, WHAT vs THAT

Expert replies
by kvitkod » Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:41 am
The region in southern Asia formerly under British rule includes the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar.
(a) includes the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar
(b) include what is now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar
(c) included the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and what is now Myanmar
(d) included the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and they ruled Myanmar
(e) include what are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar

OA is A. I went to C, since past tense looks nore logical for me. I dislike WHAT IS now, but it seemed ok for me.

Could smb explain the difference btw WHAT and THAT. thank you in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vikram4689 » Sat Jun 11, 2011 10:34 am
region is singular so includes, this solves the problem :)

Why you think past tense is required.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by kvitkod » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:04 pm
region is singular so includes, this solves the problem

Why you think past tense is required.
because we are talking about past. THE REGION INCLUDED smth THAT IS NOW smth.
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:24 pm
The region Includes.. So A
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by TOPGMAT » Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Hi Experts,
This question is from Kaplan test. Although I chose the option "A" I want to
understand the concept correctly. Please tell me why "Included" is wrong, if I
rephrase the sentence in the following way.

The region in southern Asia formerly under British rule included the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar.

Does inclusion of "included" nonsensically imply that the areas were in the past
and don't exist anymore ?
Never mind what others do; do better than yourself, beat your own record from day to day and you are a success - William Boetcker
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:26 pm
HI TopGmat,

You answered your query yourself :)
you're correct that "included" nonsensically implies that the areas were included in the past
and are no longer part of the region.
Join the discussion

by garima99 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:29 pm
TOPGMAT wrote:Hi Experts,
This question is from Kaplan test. Although I chose the option "A" I want to
understand the concept correctly. Please tell me why "Included" is wrong, if I
rephrase the sentence in the following way.

The region in southern Asia formerly under British rule included the areas that are now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar.

Does inclusion of "included" nonsensically imply that the areas were in the past
and don't exist anymore ?
You answered your question yourself!! :)
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:08 am
But whats the point of saying " regions that are now " unless the author wants to compare the past to the present
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by TOPGMAT » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:33 pm
Hi MundaSingh,
"The region includes areas that are now...". Here the sub clause following "that" defines areas
and not region.

I hope this helps.
Also note that region is singular.

Regards,
TOP
Never mind what others do; do better than yourself, beat your own record from day to day and you are a success - William Boetcker
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:27 pm
TOPGMAT wrote:Hi MundaSingh,
"The region includes areas that are now...". Here the sub clause following "that" defines areas
and not region.

I hope this helps.
Also note that region is singular.

Regards,
TOP
The issue remains the same
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1