BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

K

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:51 pm
IMO B
the question is basically asking whether the number k is prime or not
1) INSUFF
36- has lot of factors >1 and <36
37-None

2)13!+2<= k<=13!+13
13! has numbers upto 13 as factors
now you add any number>=2 to 13! it will have a factor between 2 and 13 inclusive, so k is not prime.
SUFFICIENT

good job posting these questions man, definitely 700+ level
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:22 am
tohellandback wrote:IMO B
the question is basically asking whether the number k is prime or not
1) INSUFF
36- has lot of factors >1 and <36
37-None

2)13!+2<= k<=13!+13
13! has numbers upto 13 as factors
now you add any number>=2 to 13! it will have a factor between 2 and 13 inclusive, so k is not prime.
SUFFICIENT

good job posting these questions man, definitely 700+ level
I don't understand how do you find that the integer formed by adding add an integer (greater than equal 2 but less than equal 13) to 13! is not prime number?

pl. explain
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:29 am
real2008 wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO B
the question is basically asking whether the number k is prime or not
1) INSUFF
36- has lot of factors >1 and <36
37-None

2)13!+2<= k<=13!+13
13! has numbers upto 13 as factors
now you add any number>=2 to 13! it will have a factor between 2 and 13 inclusive, so k is not prime.
SUFFICIENT

good job posting these questions man, definitely 700+ level
I don't understand how do you find that the integer formed by adding add an integer (greater than equal 2 but less than equal 13) to 13! is not prime number?

pl. explain
will give you an example
let's say 4! i.e. 1*2*3*4 so 2, 3 and 4 are factors
now if you add 4! + 3, it will not be prime because 4! is of the form 3K(because 3 is a factor)
so 4!+3 is 3k+3 =3(k+1) so 3 is a factor and thas why 4!+3 can't be prime

now lets take a bigger number. for ex 100!
factors are 1,2,3,4,....100
we have to see if 100! +59 is prime or not
No because 100! is of the form 59K
so 100!+ 59 is 59K+59=59(k+1), so 59 is a factor and the number cannot be prime
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by rohan_vus » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:37 am
Going to basiscs.. definition of prime says any its divisble by itself and 1.
So in general lets say for any integer k such that k! is yet another integer which is divisble by all integers > 1 upto k! .. as k! = 2*3*..*k

Now coming to the point if you add 1 to K! and get K! + 1 , it means its the reverse of earlier situation . Now k! + 1 is not divisble by any integer > 1 upto k! ...

In question here , 13! + 2<= k <13! + 13 is divisble by 2 , 13! + 3 is divisbvle by 3 , similaryly its divisble by all till 13 ( 13! + 11 , is divisble by 11 , 13! + 13 is divisible by 13 , etc ) ..its only 13! + 1 which is divisible by none other than 1.
So it can be ascertained that the given inequality mentioned avoids being prime
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:17 am
tohellandback wrote:
real2008 wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO B
the question is basically asking whether the number k is prime or not
1) INSUFF
36- has lot of factors >1 and <36
37-None

2)13!+2<= k<=13!+13
13! has numbers upto 13 as factors
now you add any number>=2 to 13! it will have a factor between 2 and 13 inclusive, so k is not prime.
SUFFICIENT

good job posting these questions man, definitely 700+ level
I don't understand how do you find that the integer formed by adding add an integer (greater than equal 2 but less than equal 13) to 13! is not prime number?

pl. explain
will give you an example
let's say 4! i.e. 1*2*3*4 so 2, 3 and 4 are factors
now if you add 4! + 3, it will not be prime because 4! is of the form 3K(because 3 is a factor)
so 4!+3 is 3k+3 =3(k+1) so 3 is a factor and thas why 4!+3 can't be prime

now lets take a bigger number. for ex 100!
factors are 1,2,3,4,....100
we have to see if 100! +59 is prime or not
No because 100! is of the form 59K
so 100!+ 59 is 59K+59=59(k+1), so 59 is a factor and the number cannot be prime
Thanks! Oh it was so simple that I should have done myself...
Join the discussion