OG DS 154

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:53 am
Thanked: 6 times

OG DS 154

by navalpike » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:55 pm
Hi Ian,

You have actually commented on this problem in a previous link. However, I was unable to find a link in which you actually solve this problem step by step. I have a lot of trouble with inequalities and am having a hard time figuring out this problem.( OG's well known solution states something like "the reasoning can be a little complex"). Appreciate your help in advance.

Is X negative?

a) x^3(1-x^2)<0
b) x^2-1<0

In another link "Ed09" comments that "we both agree that (-1<x<0) is the solution of the system of inequalities given". Can you show how he reached this conclusion?
Thanks,
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

Re: OG DS 154

by nervesofsteel » Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:02 pm
navalpike wrote:Hi Ian,

You have actually commented on this problem in a previous link. However, I was unable to find a link in which you actually solve this problem step by step. I have a lot of trouble with inequalities and am having a hard time figuring out this problem.( OG's well known solution states something like "the reasoning can be a little complex"). Appreciate your help in advance.

Is X negative?

a) x^3(1-x^2)<0
b) x^2-1<0

In another link "Ed09" comments that "we both agree that (-1<x<0) is the solution of the system of inequalities given". Can you show how he reached this conclusion?
Thanks,
is C the OA..??

put x = -0.1 and 0.1

with b) as true
a) becomes x^3(+ve) < 0

to satisfy a) x has to be -ve....

thus C

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 2:49 am
Thanked: 9 times

by SanjeevK » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:42 am
IMO C:

a: x^3(1-x^2)<0.
either x^3 < 0 and (1-x^2)>0
(1-x^2) > 0 => 1> x^2 => -1 < x < 1.
Hence for this we have -1<x<0
or x^3 > 0 and (1-x^2)<0
(1-x^2)<0 => 1<x^2 => x<-1 or x>1
Hence for this we have x>1
insufficient

b: x^2-1<0
=> x^2 < 1 => -1<x<1
Insufficient

Combining a and b we have -1<x<0
sufficient

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

Re: OG DS 154

by Ian Stewart » Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:24 am
navalpike wrote:
Is X negative?

a) x^3(1-x^2)<0
b) x^2-1<0
First, Statement 2 gives us that x^2 < 1, or that -1 < x < 1, so is insufficient.

In Statement 1, we can divide both sides by x^2 (since x^2 must be positive, we don't need to be worried about whether to reverse the inequality) to get:

x*(1 - x^2)<0

or

x < x^3

This is an inequality comparing two different powers of x, and these show up often on the GMAT, so it's important to know how to analyse them (in fact, the inequality in Statement 2 is of the same type if you rewrite it as x^2 < 1; on one side we have x^2 and on the other we have x^0). First, notice that you can always multiply or divide both sides of these kinds of inequalities by any *even* power of x without needing to worry about reversing the inequality, since any even power of x cannot be negative. So, if you see:

x^97 < x^99

you can divide both sides by x^96 to get

x < x^3

and if you see

1/x^5 < 1/x^3

or equivalently

x^(-5) < x^(-3)

you can multiply on both sides by x^6 to get

x < x^3

Now, what does the inequality x < x^3 tell us? For which values of x is it true? We can break this down in a few ways. Of course you'll only need one method on the test, but I'll suggest three, each of which can be used reliably:

1. Notice that the left and right side of the inequality are equal when x = -1, 0 and 1. These three numbers are the only potential 'turning points' for the inequality; if you imagine gradually increasing x, for example, the inequality may change from being true to being false (or vice versa) as x passes -1, 0 and 1. This allows us to analyse the inequality by picking numbers:

-if the inequality is true for any number less than -1, it's true for all numbers less than -1;
-if the inequality is true for any number between -1 and 0, it's true for all numbers between -1 and 0;
-if the inequality is true for any number between 0 and 1, it's true for all numbers between 0 and 1;
-if the inequality is true for any number greater than 1, it's true for all numbers greater than 1.

So if you plug in -2, -1/2, 1/2 and 2, you can see exactly when the inequality is true or false. For the inequality x < x^3, we find that it's true whenever -1 < x < 0, and whenever x > 1.

This method tends to be very fast with some practice, and is what I'd normally use. You can only use this method when you have a simple inequality with different powers of x (or some other letter) on each side, but it can be used in this situation no matter what powers are involved.

There are algebraic methods as well:

2. Rewrite the inequality with 0 on one side, and a product on the other side. Here we have x - x^3 < 0, or x(1 - x^2) < 0. Since we are multiplying two things and getting a negative result, one of them must be positive, and one must be negative. That is:

*either x < 0, and 1 - x^2 > 0, which means that 1 > x^2, and -1 < x < 1. Combining that with the assumption that x < 0, we have that -1 < x < 0;

*or x > 0, and 1 - x^2 < 0, which means that x^2 > 1, and x > 1 or x < -1. Combining that with the assumption that x > 0, we have that x > 1.

So we find that either -1 < x < 0, or x > 1.

3. Rewrite the inequality with 0 on one side, and a complete factorization on the other:

x < x^3
0 < x^3 - x
0 < x(x^2 - 1)
0 < x*(x - 1)*(x + 1)

It's most useful to write these factors in increasing order:

0 < (x-1)*x*(x+1)

Now we have a product which is positive. Either:

-all three factors are positive, which means that even the smallest factor is positive, so x - 1 > 0, and x > 1.

-two factors are negative, and one is positive. The smaller two factors must be negative, so x < 0, and the largest factor must be positive, so x+1 > 0, or x > -1. Combining this information, we have that -1 < x < 0.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:53 am
Thanked: 6 times

by navalpike » Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:52 am
Great explanation. Thanks a million.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: OG DS 154

by kanha81 » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:13 am
Ian Stewart wrote:
navalpike wrote:
Is X negative?

a) x^3(1-x^2)<0
b) x^2-1<0
First, Statement 2 gives us that x^2 < 1, or that -1 < x < 1, so is insufficient.

In Statement 1, we can divide both sides by x^2 (since x^2 must be positive, we don't need to be worried about whether to reverse the inequality) to get:

x*(1 - x^2)<0

or

x < x^3

This is an inequality comparing two different powers of x, and these show up often on the GMAT, so it's important to know how to analyse them (in fact, the inequality in Statement 2 is of the same type if you rewrite it as x^2 < 1; on one side we have x^2 and on the other we have x^0). First, notice that you can always multiply or divide both sides of these kinds of inequalities by any *even* power of x without needing to worry about reversing the inequality, since any even power of x cannot be negative. So, if you see:

x^97 < x^99

you can divide both sides by x^96 to get

x < x^3

and if you see

1/x^5 < 1/x^3

or equivalently

x^(-5) < x^(-3)

you can multiply on both sides by x^6 to get

x < x^3

Now, what does the inequality x < x^3 tell us? For which values of x is it true? We can break this down in a few ways. Of course you'll only need one method on the test, but I'll suggest three, each of which can be used reliably:

1. Notice that the left and right side of the inequality are equal when x = -1, 0 and 1. These three numbers are the only potential 'turning points' for the inequality; if you imagine gradually increasing x, for example, the inequality may change from being true to being false (or vice versa) as x passes -1, 0 and 1. This allows us to analyse the inequality by picking numbers:

-if the inequality is true for any number less than -1, it's true for all numbers less than -1;
-if the inequality is true for any number between -1 and 0, it's true for all numbers between -1 and 0;
-if the inequality is true for any number between 0 and 1, it's true for all numbers between 0 and 1;
-if the inequality is true for any number greater than 1, it's true for all numbers greater than 1.

So if you plug in -2, -1/2, 1/2 and 2, you can see exactly when the inequality is true or false. For the inequality x < x^3, we find that it's true whenever -1 < x < 0, and whenever x > 1.

This method tends to be very fast with some practice, and is what I'd normally use. You can only use this method when you have a simple inequality with different powers of x (or some other letter) on each side, but it can be used in this situation no matter what powers are involved.

There are algebraic methods as well:

2. Rewrite the inequality with 0 on one side, and a product on the other side. Here we have x - x^3 < 0, or x(1 - x^2) < 0. Since we are multiplying two things and getting a negative result, one of them must be positive, and one must be negative. That is:

*either x < 0, and 1 - x^2 > 0, which means that 1 > x^2, and -1 < x < 1. Combining that with the assumption that x < 0, we have that -1 < x < 0;

*or x > 0, and 1 - x^2 < 0, which means that x^2 > 1, and x > 1 or x < -1. Combining that with the assumption that x > 0, we have that x > 1.

So we find that either -1 < x < 0, or x > 1.

3. Rewrite the inequality with 0 on one side, and a complete factorization on the other:

x < x^3
0 < x^3 - x
0 < x(x^2 - 1)
0 < x*(x - 1)*(x + 1)

It's most useful to write these factors in increasing order:

0 < (x-1)*x*(x+1)

Now we have a product which is positive. Either:

-all three factors are positive, which means that even the smallest factor is positive, so x - 1 > 0, and x > 1.

-two factors are negative, and one is positive. The smaller two factors must be negative, so x < 0, and the largest factor must be positive, so x+1 > 0, or x > -1. Combining this information, we have that -1 < x < 0.
What a beautiful explanation. Thanks a bunch Ian.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:18 am

by kungfupanda » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:18 pm
guys...i dont want to sound like an arrogant moron, but this is not how you tackle this question. its (picking numbers) quite lengthy process and involves a lot of time and analysis. u guys are complicating it. no offence to anyone
it can be done within less than a minute using number line
ill see if i can upload the solution...