BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT DS Question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ColumbiaVC » Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:19 pm
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:44 pm
anujmalik wrote:What is the ratio of r to s?

(1) r + s = 7

(2) r^2 - s^2 = 7
(1) r, s can take many values so that r + s = 7, viz., r = 4, s = 3, r = 2, s = 5, r = 1, s = 6 and so on. We don't have a definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) r² - s² = 7 or (r + s)(r - s) = 7
Now, r = 4, s = 3 then r : s = 4 : 3
r = 4, s = -3 then r : s = 4 : -3
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), the only possible value of r = 4 and s = 3, so r : s = 4 : 3

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by anujmalik » Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:49 pm
Thanks Anurag I missed the values 4 and -3 and thus ended up with B thinking only 4 and 3 could solve this and thus A is not need but your explanation clearly shows the possible values!!
Join the discussion

by GAMATO » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:35 am
Hi Anurag,

I tried to solve it in a different way and got E. Could you please help me understand where am i going wrong?

Statement(1): r + s = 7
picking numbers: r = 3, s = 4 and r = 4, s = 3 we can say that St (1) is NOT sufficient

Statement(2): r^2 - s^2 = 7
(r-s)*(r+s)= 7

Again picking numbers r = 4, s = 3 and r = 4, s = -3 we can say that St (2) is NOT sufficient

Combining (1) and (2)

(r-s)*(r+s)= 7
(r-s)*7= 7
r-s = 1

So both options together are NOT sufficient.

Am I doing something wrong?


Anurag@Gurome wrote:
anujmalik wrote:What is the ratio of r to s?

(1) r + s = 7

(2) r^2 - s^2 = 7
(1) r, s can take many values so that r + s = 7, viz., r = 4, s = 3, r = 2, s = 5, r = 1, s = 6 and so on. We don't have a definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) r² - s² = 7 or (r + s)(r - s) = 7
Now, r = 4, s = 3 then r : s = 4 : 3
r = 4, s = -3 then r : s = 4 : -3
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), the only possible value of r = 4 and s = 3, so r : s = 4 : 3

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by nkumar13 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:58 pm
I also came up with answer as E.

Anurag,
In statement 1 why are we not considering r = 8 & s = -1.
Join the discussion

by GAMATO » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:52 am
Oops.. combining (1) and (2)
(r-s)*(r+s)= 7
(r-s)*7= 7
r-s = 1
Again r+s = 7
2r = 8
r = 4 and s 7-4 = 3

C is the Answer...

GAMATO wrote:Hi Anurag,

I tried to solve it in a different way and got E. Could you please help me understand where am i going wrong?

Statement(1): r + s = 7
picking numbers: r = 3, s = 4 and r = 4, s = 3 we can say that St (1) is NOT sufficient

Statement(2): r^2 - s^2 = 7
(r-s)*(r+s)= 7

Again picking numbers r = 4, s = 3 and r = 4, s = -3 we can say that St (2) is NOT sufficient

Combining (1) and (2)

(r-s)*(r+s)= 7
(r-s)*7= 7
r-s = 1

So both options together are NOT sufficient.

Am I doing something wrong?


Anurag@Gurome wrote:
anujmalik wrote:What is the ratio of r to s?

(1) r + s = 7

(2) r^2 - s^2 = 7
(1) r, s can take many values so that r + s = 7, viz., r = 4, s = 3, r = 2, s = 5, r = 1, s = 6 and so on. We don't have a definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) r² - s² = 7 or (r + s)(r - s) = 7
Now, r = 4, s = 3 then r : s = 4 : 3
r = 4, s = -3 then r : s = 4 : -3
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), the only possible value of r = 4 and s = 3, so r : s = 4 : 3

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:47 pm
GAMATO wrote:Oops.. combining (1) and (2)
(r-s)*(r+s)= 7
(r-s)*7= 7
r-s = 1
Again r+s = 7
2r = 8
r = 4 and s 7-4 = 3

C is the Answer...

GAMATO wrote:Hi Anurag,

I tried to solve it in a different way and got E. Could you please help me understand where am i going wrong?

Statement(1): r + s = 7
picking numbers: r = 3, s = 4 and r = 4, s = 3 we can say that St (1) is NOT sufficient

Statement(2): r^2 - s^2 = 7
(r-s)*(r+s)= 7

Again picking numbers r = 4, s = 3 and r = 4, s = -3 we can say that St (2) is NOT sufficient

Combining (1) and (2)

(r-s)*(r+s)= 7
(r-s)*7= 7
r-s = 1

So both options together are NOT sufficient.

Am I doing something wrong?


Anurag@Gurome wrote:
anujmalik wrote:What is the ratio of r to s?

(1) r + s = 7

(2) r^2 - s^2 = 7
(1) r, s can take many values so that r + s = 7, viz., r = 4, s = 3, r = 2, s = 5, r = 1, s = 6 and so on. We don't have a definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) r² - s² = 7 or (r + s)(r - s) = 7
Now, r = 4, s = 3 then r : s = 4 : 3
r = 4, s = -3 then r : s = 4 : -3
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), the only possible value of r = 4 and s = 3, so r : s = 4 : 3

The correct answer is C.
That's right. You answered it on your own :)
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion