BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Peder currently works 40 hours a week

Expert replies
by guerrero » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:51 am
Peder currently works 40 hours a week. If his hourly wage went up by $3, how many fewer hours could he work and still earn the same weekly income as he did before the increase?

A)His weekly income is currently $600.
B)The increase of $3 is a 20 percent increase over his currently hourly wage.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:10 am
guerrero wrote:Peder currently works 40 hours a week. If his hourly wage went up by $3, how many fewer hours could he work and still earn the same weekly income as he did before the increase?

A)His weekly income is currently $600.
B)The increase of $3 is a 20 percent increase over his currently hourly wage.
This question has a great takeaway: DO NOT PERFORM UNNECESSARY CALCULATIONS. Remember that DS question require to determine whether or not we have enough (sufficient) information to answer the target question. WE NEED NOT ACTUALLY ANSWER THE TARGET QUESTION.


Target question: How many fewer hours could Peder work and still earn the same weekly income as he did before the increase?

IMPORTANT: To answer the target question, all we need to do is determine Peder's current rate of pay (salary). Once we know his current salary, we can answer the target question.

Statement 1: His weekly income is currently $600.
Perfect!
Notice that we COULD use this information to determine Peder's current hourly wage ($600/40 = $15/hour), and then we COULD determine Peder's rate of pay after the $3 increase ($18/hour) and then we COULD determine how many fewer hours Peder needs to work to make $600 (40 - 600/18 = 6 2/3 fewer hours) .
HOWEVER, we'd never perform all of those calculations, because our only job here is to determine whether or not the statements are sufficient.
So, since we COULD answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT


Statement 2: The increase of $3 is a 20 percent increase over his currently hourly wage.
In other words, $3 = 20% of Peder's current hourly rate of pay
Since we COULD use this to determine Peder's current hourly rate of pay ($15/hour), then we COULD eventually answer the target question with certainty.
So, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion