BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Difficult SC problem from Knewton

Expert replies
by need720+ » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:10 am
In 2003, despite the popularity of diets that focused on an increase in the consumption of animal proteins, the number of United States citizens considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at 5 million.

(A) considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at
(B) considering themselves "vegan" jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(C) who considered themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(D) who considered themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at
(E) to consider themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at

OA after some discussion. Please provide explanation.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by viv_gmat » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:53 am
the number of US citizens considering themselves....Not as good as "who considered themselves"
So, A and B out.
In D "has" is missing.
E is out..awkward.
IMO C is the best choice.

OA plz.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:54 am
(A) considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at
(B) considering themselves "vegan" jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(C) who considered themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(D) who considered themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at
(E) to consider themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at


The intended meaning of this Sc is that the number of people jumped to 5 million
The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:15 am
mundasingh123 wrote: The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
Hi mundasingh123,

Is it ok to use 'considering' to modify citizens? IMO participle is used to modify entire clause or action in the clause but not the noun immediately before the participle.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:36 am
need720+ wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote: The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
Hi mundasingh123,

Is it ok to use 'considering' to modify citizens? IMO participle is used to modify entire clause or action in the clause but not the noun immediately before the participle.
Thats a Comma + Participle Modifier You are talking about. Thats different . There is no comma here
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by viv_gmat » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:43 am
mundasingh123 wrote:(A) considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at
(B) considering themselves "vegan" jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(C) who considered themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(D) who considered themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at
(E) to consider themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at


The intended meaning of this Sc is that the number of people jumped to 5 million
The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
Hi, it may be a completely vague question, but I'm a little confused with the past tense here...It says- In 2003, alright, but what is the event against which you decided its a past tense?

Your thoughts plz.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:49 am
viv_gmat wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:(A) considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at
(B) considering themselves "vegan" jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(C) who considered themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(D) who considered themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at
(E) to consider themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at


The intended meaning of this Sc is that the number of people jumped to 5 million
The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
Hi, it may be a completely vague question, but I'm a little confused with the past tense here...It says- In 2003, alright, but what is the event against which you decided its a past tense?

Your thoughts plz.
Just tried to understand the intended meaning .i assumed Had it been this year , the Sc would not have stated the year .
Also The verb tense that has been used for popularity is in the past
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by viv_gmat » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:00 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
viv_gmat wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:(A) considering themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, at
(B) considering themselves "vegan" jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(C) who considered themselves "vegan" has jumped by almost 100 percent, to
(D) who considered themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at
(E) to consider themselves "vegan" jumped almost by 100 percent, at


The intended meaning of this Sc is that the number of people jumped to 5 million
The only 2 options that qualify for this sentence are B and C
C has a tense issue . The event happened in the past .
So This leaves B
Hi, it may be a completely vague question, but I'm a little confused with the past tense here...It says- In 2003, alright, but what is the event against which you decided its a past tense?

Your thoughts plz.
Just tried to understand the intended meaning .i assumed Had it been this year , the Sc would not have stated the year .
Also The verb tense that has been used for popularity is in the past
That's a good point...It won't make sense mentioning the current year as "in 2003"...Thanks
Join the discussion

by need720+ » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:34 am
mundasingh123 wrote:Thats a Comma + Participle Modifier You are talking about. Thats different . There is no comma here
Thanks mundasingh123.
OA is B.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1