-
yellowho
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:51 pm
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:2 members
I've read in multiple sources that "since" signals the use of present-perfect tense. This is not the always a hard rule and there are exceptions. Below is an exception but I don't understand the rule behind this exception:
Since it successfully negotiated payments from insurers with large presence in the local market, FHS started offering digital visits.
1) Here applying the rule the sentence should be "has started." This is wrong. The suggested answer is "had negotiated" and "started." I understand why this is correct (to show sequence of events) but why isn't "negotiated" +"has started" also correct.
2) What is the difference in meaning of the two usage?
Since it successfully negotiated payments from insurers with large presence in the local market, FHS started offering digital visits.
1) Here applying the rule the sentence should be "has started." This is wrong. The suggested answer is "had negotiated" and "started." I understand why this is correct (to show sequence of events) but why isn't "negotiated" +"has started" also correct.
2) What is the difference in meaning of the two usage?












