BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Numbers

Expert replies
by sachindia » Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:37 am
Is x2(x square) greater than x?

1)x square greater than 1
2)
x is greater than -1.


the Question has been rephrased as 'Is x a positive proper fraction (a fraction between zero and one)?' in Manhattan book.

I didn't understand how is the question mentioned in the first line equivalent to the one mentioned in single quotes above.

Please help.
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:09 am
sachindia wrote:Is x2(x square) greater than x?

1)x square greater than 1
2)
x is greater than -1.


the Question has been rephrased as 'Is x a positive proper fraction (a fraction between zero and one)?' in Manhattan book.

I didn't understand how is the question mentioned in the first line equivalent to the one mentioned in single quotes above.

Please help.
X^2 > X
X^2 - X > 0
X( X - 1 ) > 0
ie X > 1 and X < 0
ie on a number line if you plot this equation, X will NEVER be true for any value between 0 and 1.
ie NOT a proper fraction.

Hence reverse of what is asked ie a Proper Fraction.
Both types are conjugates and answer requires a Y/N only.
Hope this helps!
Last edited by imskpwr on Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:31 am, edited 3 times in total.
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:16 am
imskpwr wrote:
sachindia wrote:Is x2(x square) greater than x?

1)x square greater than 1
2)
x is greater than -1.


the Question has been rephrased as 'Is x a positive proper fraction (a fraction between zero and one)?' in Manhattan book.

I didn't understand how is the question mentioned in the first line equivalent to the one mentioned in single quotes above.

Please help.
X^2 > X
X^2 - X > 0
X( X - 1 ) > 0
so on a number line if you draw this equation, X will be true for all values between 0 and 1 only.
ie a proper fraction.

Hope this helps!
Thanks but
X(X-1)> 0 for say x=4 as well. How can it be true only for values between 0 and 1 only?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:26 am
sachindia wrote:Thanks but
X(X-1)> 0 for say x=4 as well. How can it be true only for values between 0 and 1 only?
one correction I have made in above post.
Join the discussion

by tisrar02 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:08 pm
Here's my logic and correct me if i'm wrong:

1) If x^2 is greater than 1, that means that x MUST also be greater than 1 due to the fact that any number between 0 and 1 squared will yield a non- integer number less than 1. So any number squared that is GREATER than 1 would always be greater than its root. SUFFICIENT

2) X could be between 0 and -1 which means that X^2 would be greater than X. If X is 0, then they would both be equal. If X was greater than 1 then X^2 would be greater than X. NOT SUFFICIENT

My answer would be A

I did this in my head so please let me know if I am correct.

Thank you
Last edited by tisrar02 on Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by eagleeye » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:08 pm
tisrar02 wrote:Here's my logic and correct me if i'm wrong:

1) If x^2 is greater than 1, that means that x MUST also be greater than 1 due to the fact that any number between 0 and 1 squared will yield a non- integer number less than 1. So any number squared that is GREATER than 1 would always be greater than its root. SUFFICIENT
Your thought process and logic is in the right direction. You did get the right answer, however the logic is slightly flawed. On a different question, it may have lead to the wrong answer.
Let's consider the statements:

x^2 > 1 can mean one of two things.
a. x>1 and also
b. x<-1
You considered only the first case.
Not considering x<-1 in this case worked out because if x<-1, x is negative and x^2 is positive, and hence x^2>x. So A is correct here. Always make sure to consider all possible cases.
tisrar02 wrote: 2) X could be between 0 and -1 which means that X^2 would be less than X. If X is 0, then they would both be equal. If X was greater than 1 then X^2 would be greater than X. NOT SUFFICIENT
Hi tisrar02:
2) Good choice with 0 as an option for x. Again, you knew what you were doing and arrived at the answer. I did, however, notice a slight flaw in logic.
tisrar02 wrote: 2) X could be between 0 and -1 which means that X^2 would be less than X.

In the statement above, if x is between 0 and -1, x is negative, which means x^2 is GREATER than x. You inferred the wrong sign. While some may dismiss these things as "careless errors", these may lead to all the hard-work you did on a question to lead you astray. We all fall prey to such errors, (well at least I certainly do at times), but we should strive for perfect practice. Overall, I am happy with the thought process. With perfect practice, you will only get better!

:)
Join the discussion

by tisrar02 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:22 pm
Thank you Eagle-eye. You made me realize such careless mistakes. I also changed my error so I don't throw anyone off.. Good eye Eagle Eye!

You're AWESOME!
Join the discussion