BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

lowering vs a lowering of vs lowered

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:01 am
Thanked: 2 times
by rajatvmittal » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:46 am
Hi

I had this question in OG#12 - Q 130. I have a question on this one

see the sentences:-
a) a large drop in oil prices would eventually lead to lowering interest rates
b) a large drop in oil prices would eventually lead to a lowering of interest rates
c) a large drop in oil prices would eventually lead to low interest rates

Are all three correct? What is difference in the meaning of the sentences?

thanks
Rajat
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 amFollowed by: 266 members
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:56 am
There is a difference in all of the phrases:

a) lead to rates that are decreasing continuously
b) lead to a change in the value of the rates to one that is less than the current value
c) lead to rates that are low in nominal value, regardless of where they are now.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by rajatvmittal » Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:57 pm
Thanks Jim. that was really subtle!

one more question similar to the previous one: -

The recent surge in the number of airplane flights has clogged the nation's air-traffic control system, leading to 55 percent more delay at airports.

The recent surge in the number of airplane flights has clogged the nation's air-traffic control system, leading to a 55 percent increase in delays at airports.

What is the difference in the meaning of two sentences?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1