Hi all,
I need some honest feedback here. I just took the GMAT for the first time this past weekend, and got a 660. My Verbal was 42 (95th percentile) and my Quant score was 39 (52nd percentile). I have a 3.7 GPA from UC-Santa Barbara, with distinction in my major Communication, and an English minor. UCSB has an extremely well regarded Comm program, ranked first in the country in some publications. I have 5 years of experience as a retail buyer for well known national chains.
I want an MBA to get into consulting, marketing or general management, and am definitely not looking to get into finance or accounting. My question is whether or not to re-take the GMAT. I've read that many schools average scores. Simply, put if I retake it and stay at a similar level for Verbal, and improve Quant to a 41 or 42, is that going to make any practical difference in my applications?
I need some honest feedback here. I just took the GMAT for the first time this past weekend, and got a 660. My Verbal was 42 (95th percentile) and my Quant score was 39 (52nd percentile). I have a 3.7 GPA from UC-Santa Barbara, with distinction in my major Communication, and an English minor. UCSB has an extremely well regarded Comm program, ranked first in the country in some publications. I have 5 years of experience as a retail buyer for well known national chains.
I want an MBA to get into consulting, marketing or general management, and am definitely not looking to get into finance or accounting. My question is whether or not to re-take the GMAT. I've read that many schools average scores. Simply, put if I retake it and stay at a similar level for Verbal, and improve Quant to a 41 or 42, is that going to make any practical difference in my applications?

















