BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

karen and jason

Expert replies
by Viper83 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:52 am
jason and karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. what is p?

1. in 1995 karens salary was 2000 dollars greater than jason's.
2. in 1998 karen's salary was 2440 dollars greater than jason's.

C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:57 am
Hi,
Let the salaries of Karen and Jason be a and b respectively in 1995.
So, their salaries will be a(1+p/100) and b(1+p/100) in 1998
From(1): a-b = 2000. Can't find p
Insufficient
From(2): (a-b)(1+p/100) = 2440. Can't find p
Insufficient
Both (1)&(2): 2000(1+p/100) = 2440(enough to solve for p)
1+p/100 = 1.22 =>p=22
Sufficient

Hence, C
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:10 am
Viper83 wrote:jason and karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. what is p?

1. in 1995 karens salary was 2000 dollars greater than jason's.
2. in 1998 karen's salary was 2440 dollars greater than jason's.

C
Statement 1 tells us nothing about 1998.
Statement 2 tells us nothing about 1995.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Since each salary increased by p%, the difference between the two salaries also increased by p%.
Percent increase in the difference = (Difference in 1998 - Difference in 1995)/(Difference in 1995) * 100 = (2440-2000)/2000 * 100 = 440/2000 * 100 = 22%.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion