Harsha,
Bro, If i say X=1 ,it wont fit for st 2...agreed na?? The number we pick shuld satisfy both the conditions all alone.But here it is NOT.
Plz bro,I am tired of this thread....I am going for C only...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evenness_of_zero
Plz go thru the link which states zero is even....
Data sufficiency question - Pls help
-
gmatmachoman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
- harshavardhanc
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 68 times
- GMAT Score:680
buddy, that's where your starting is inappropriate.gmatmachoman wrote:Harsha,
Bro, If i say X=1 ,it wont fit for st 2...agreed na?? The number we pick shuld satisfy both the conditions all alone.But here it is NOT.
Plz bro,I am tired of this thread....I am going for C only...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evenness_of_zero
Plz go thru the link which states zero is even....
YOU don't have to pick a number.
You are GIVEN a number which satisfies a condition.
It may be st1.
OR
St2.
You just have to tell, based on the condition, whether the number is odd.
Again, you should and MUST not pick number.
don't give up ! you should fight till the point you are satisfied.
Regards,
Harsha
Harsha
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
OK - everyone needs to calm down!
Let's discuss a few key concepts:
1) 0 is an even "uncharged" (i.e. it's neither positive nor negative) integer.
2) In data sufficiency, the statements never contradict each other. However, they can be complementary, i.e. have some solutions in common and some not in common.
3) In DS, the statements are the law; when you evaluate a statement, you think "given that this statement is true, do I have enough information to answer the question?".
Now, to this specific question:
We see the word "is", we think "yes/no question: a definite "yes" is sufficient, a definite "no" is sufficient, a "sometimes yes/sometimes no" is insufficient".
We need to determine if x is an odd integer. What do we know about x? Absolutely nothing. Could be even, odd or a non-integer (sign is irrelevant for determining oddness/evenness, so we don't care about -/0/+).
Step 2: evaluate the statements.
1) x + 3 is even.
We can translate this just like any other word problem, treating "is" as our equal sign:
x + 3 = even
x = even - 3
Well, an even minus an odd will always be odd; that's a definite "yes" answer: sufficient.
We could have also plugged in numbers - let our even number be 2 and we get:
x = 2 - 3 = -1
which is odd... sufficient.
(Note: on odd/even questions, once you've tried one even or odd number, there's no need to test similar numbers.)
2) x/3 is odd
Again, let's translate to an equation:
x/3 = odd
x = odd * 3
Well, an odd times an odd is always odd - that's a definite "yes" answer: sufficient.
Each statement is sufficient alone, no need to combine, choose (D).
Now, for those confused about the seeming conflict between the statements, there is none. Conflict only exists when the statements cannot generate a common answer to the question. Here, both statements gave us a "definite yes", so we're fine.
Also, the two statements have at least one numerical solution in common (x=3, for example, satisfies both conditions), so again, no conflict.
Let's discuss a few key concepts:
1) 0 is an even "uncharged" (i.e. it's neither positive nor negative) integer.
2) In data sufficiency, the statements never contradict each other. However, they can be complementary, i.e. have some solutions in common and some not in common.
3) In DS, the statements are the law; when you evaluate a statement, you think "given that this statement is true, do I have enough information to answer the question?".
Now, to this specific question:
Step 1: analyze the question.Is x an odd integer?
(1) x + 3 is an even integer.
(2) x/3 is an odd integer.
We see the word "is", we think "yes/no question: a definite "yes" is sufficient, a definite "no" is sufficient, a "sometimes yes/sometimes no" is insufficient".
We need to determine if x is an odd integer. What do we know about x? Absolutely nothing. Could be even, odd or a non-integer (sign is irrelevant for determining oddness/evenness, so we don't care about -/0/+).
Step 2: evaluate the statements.
1) x + 3 is even.
We can translate this just like any other word problem, treating "is" as our equal sign:
x + 3 = even
x = even - 3
Well, an even minus an odd will always be odd; that's a definite "yes" answer: sufficient.
We could have also plugged in numbers - let our even number be 2 and we get:
x = 2 - 3 = -1
which is odd... sufficient.
(Note: on odd/even questions, once you've tried one even or odd number, there's no need to test similar numbers.)
2) x/3 is odd
Again, let's translate to an equation:
x/3 = odd
x = odd * 3
Well, an odd times an odd is always odd - that's a definite "yes" answer: sufficient.
Each statement is sufficient alone, no need to combine, choose (D).
Now, for those confused about the seeming conflict between the statements, there is none. Conflict only exists when the statements cannot generate a common answer to the question. Here, both statements gave us a "definite yes", so we're fine.
Also, the two statements have at least one numerical solution in common (x=3, for example, satisfies both conditions), so again, no conflict.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
Wow!!! Thanks Stuart for clearing the air .
Phew !!!! that settles it .
Thanks a ton Stuart once again.
It seems I am not the only one talking about 3 and multiples of 3 .Also, the two statements have at least one numerical solution in common (x=3, for example, satisfies both conditions), so again, no conflict.
Phew !!!! that settles it .
Thanks a ton Stuart once again.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

















