BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Is it the wording?

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:02 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:3 members

Is it the wording?

by jzw » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:20 am
#61 in the official guide - data sufficiency

"At a certain picnic, each of the guests were served either a single scoop or a double scoop of ice cream. How many of the guests were served a double scoop of ice cream?"

(1) A the picnic, 60 percent of the guests were served a double scoop of ice cream.
(2) A total of 120 scoops of ice cream were served to all the guests at the picnic.

Stem: guests (x) either got ss (y) or ds (z).
Target: how many guests (x) got ds (z)?

AD BCE

(1) tells me that 60% of guests got ds while the remaining 40% got ss.
- no reference point with totals or partials in numbers so no way to know how much of something is what %.
- insufficient

BCE

(2) tells me the total number of scoops served.
- no reference point as to how many are double or single.
- insufficient

CE

the answer is C, I chose E. how are both sufficient? what am I not seeing with the wording? had they used the term "single scoops" or "double scoops" instead of the term "scoops" in statement (2) I'd see how to figure out the answer. but how does known the total number of scoops help? how do we know how many we're single or double? can someone pls show in idiot proof fashion. Thanks!
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:06 am
Thanked: 18 times

by Neo Anderson » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:48 am
Stem: guests (x) either got ss (y) or ds (z).
Target: how many guests (x) got ds (z)?

AD BCE

(1) tells me that 60% of guests got ds while the remaining 40% got ss.
- no reference point with totals or partials in numbers so no way to know how much of something is what %.
- insufficient

BCE

(2) tells me the total number of scoops served.
- no reference point as to how many are double or single.
- insufficient

CE
you are absolutely right till this point, however, considering 1 and 2 together

from 1 and 2. => total guests 4N + 6N = 120

=> N=12

=> thus no of guests who were served with DS is 6N = 6 X 12 = 72
thus sufficient
and hence the answer C
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 am
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:5 members

by krusta80 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:55 pm
jzw wrote:#61 in the official guide - data sufficiency

"At a certain picnic, each of the guests were served either a single scoop or a double scoop of ice cream. How many of the guests were served a double scoop of ice cream?"

(1) At the picnic, 60 percent of the guests were served a double scoop of ice cream.
(2) At total of 120 scoops of ice cream were served to all the guests at the picnic.

Stem: guests (x) either got ss (y) or ds (z).
Target: how many guests (x) got ds (z)?

AD BCE

(1) tells me that 60% of guests got ds while the remaining 40% got ss.
- no reference point with totals or partials in numbers so no way to know how much of something is what %.
- insufficient

BCE

(2) tells me the total number of scoops served.
- no reference point as to how many are double or single.
- insufficient

CE

the answer is C, I chose E. how are both sufficient? what am I not seeing with the wording? had they used the term "single scoops" or "double scoops" instead of the term "scoops" in statement (2) I'd see how to figure out the answer. but how does known the total number of scoops help? how do we know how many we're single or double? can someone pls show in idiot proof fashion. Thanks!
Alrighty, let's see what we can do with this...

Let s denote the number of single scoops served
Let d denote the number of double scoops served

From part A, we are given:
d = .6 * (d+s), since d+s represents the total number of guests served
.4*d = .6*s
d = 3s/2

From part B, we are given:
s+2*d = 120 --> in other words, to get the total scoops, we count the single scoops once and the double scoops twice

Now we have two equations for two unknowns: s and d

Let's plug in 3s/2 for d in the second equation...

s+3s = 120
4s = 120
s = 30 single scoops served
d = 45 double scoops served

Answer is C
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:02 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:3 members

by jzw » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:37 pm
noticing that neo and krusta got the same end result (C) but used slightly different formulas in order to work them. only reason i'm asking is because the numbers end up different; is there a right or wrong way to get this? meaning, did one of these way accidentally lead to the correct answer whereas had said method been used in a different question it may have led us down to a different result? just want to make sure i understand the mechanics of how this works so i can replicate it on future problems. thanks for the assistance!
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 am
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:5 members

by krusta80 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:35 pm
jzw wrote:noticing that neo and krusta got the same end result (C) but used slightly different formulas in order to work them. only reason i'm asking is because the numbers end up different; is there a right or wrong way to get this? meaning, did one of these way accidentally lead to the correct answer whereas had said method been used in a different question it may have led us down to a different result? just want to make sure i understand the mechanics of how this works so i can replicate it on future problems. thanks for the assistance!
The reason Neo and I have different answers is because we are from different versions of the Matrix....:-P

I kid. :)

The reason for our different numbers is that I interpreted the question quite literally by counting each double-scoop served as two scoops rather than one. Neo assumed that the number of scoops equalled the number of desserts served (aka a double-scoop is a type of scoop and a single scoop is a type of scoop).

I'm actually loving that we came up with different answers; it shows how data sufficiency can be solved without number crunching (sometimes).

At the heart of this problem is recognizing the key to solving for unknown variables: you need at least as many formulas as variables to do so. Each of us came up with two linear equations to solve for the number of single scoops and the number of double scoops, and we could have safely stopped there.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:30 pm
Let the no. of people who were served single scoop of ice cream = S
and the no. of people who were served double scoop of ice cream = D

(1) At the picnic, 60 percent of the guests were served a double scoop of ice-cream.
Then S : D = 40 : 60 = 2 : 3, but using this we cannot find the value of D; NOT sufficient.

(2) A total of 120 scoops of ice-cream were served to all the guests at the picnic.
S + 2D = 120, which is again NOT sufficient to find D.

Combining (1) and (2), we have 2 equation: S = 2D/3 and S + 2D = 120
Solving we get, 2D/3 + 2D = 120; which can be solved for D; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1