-
krishna239455
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:10 am
- Thanked: 1 times
[/img]
Pls tell me the simple method to solve this problem.
I applied the logic as below: (this logic was applied after the test when I has suffeceint time to think):
1. To answer the question I basically need to know whether (r/b+w+r)>(w/b+w+r)?
2. Since b is common no need to think about it, hence the 1st statement indirectly says that (r/w)>(w/r).
3. If this is the case it means that r>w and hence it is clear that (r/b+w+r)>(w/b+w+r) is true. SUFFECIENT
Statement 2 is NOT SUFFECIENT. No need to explain it.
But I wanted to know, is there any simpler method to this than applying the above logic?
Pls tell me the simple method to solve this problem.
I applied the logic as below: (this logic was applied after the test when I has suffeceint time to think):
1. To answer the question I basically need to know whether (r/b+w+r)>(w/b+w+r)?
2. Since b is common no need to think about it, hence the 1st statement indirectly says that (r/w)>(w/r).
3. If this is the case it means that r>w and hence it is clear that (r/b+w+r)>(w/b+w+r) is true. SUFFECIENT
Statement 2 is NOT SUFFECIENT. No need to explain it.
But I wanted to know, is there any simpler method to this than applying the above logic?
- Attachments
-
- 1.doc
- (29 KiB) Downloaded 97 times
