BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Eureka

Expert replies
by siddus » Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:46 am
Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chances discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

(B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research.

(C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer.

(D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply.

(E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:51 am
IMO A.

Because, "discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought" gives indication that the investigators are currently unable to purposely seek due to the projections they made before starting their work.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:21 am
kvcpk wrote:IMO A.

Because, "discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought" gives indication that the investigators are currently unable to purposely seek due to the projections they made before starting their work.
great reasoning!

We can use the Kaplan denial test to prove that the author's reasoning depends on choice A. Choice A reads:
Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research
whose denial is:
NOT only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research
which can be rephrased as:
Findings that an investigator doesn't purposely seek can directly bear on that investigator's research
in which case, even under the grant's limitations, a researcher may hit upon something serendipitously, and the argument is defeated. Because the denial of choice A defeats the argument, the argument's reasoning relies on choice A.

Choose A.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion