Weight

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

Weight

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:27 pm
A long-term health study that followed a group of people who were age 35 in 1950 found that those whose weight increased by approximately half a kilogram or one pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, to live longer than those who maintained the weight they had at age 35. This finding seems at variance with other studies that have associated weight gain with a host of health problems that tend to lower life expectancy.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparently conflicting findings?

(A) As people age, muscle and bone tissue tends to make up a smaller and smaller proportion of total body weight.
(B) Individuals who reduce their cholesterol levels by losing weight can thereby also reduce their risk of dying from heart attacks or strokes.
(C) Smokers, who tend to be leaner than nonsmokers, tend to have shorter life spans than nonsmokers.
(D) The normal deterioration of the human immune system with age can be slowed down by a reduction in the number of calories consumed.
(E) Diets that tend to lead to weight gain often contain not only excess fat but also unhealthful concentrations of sugar and sodium.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:32 pm
IMO it is D? What is source of this and what is the OA?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:21 am
What is the OA

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:47 am
harsh.champ wrote:A long-term health study that followed a group of people who were age 35 in 1950 found that those whose weight increased by approximately half a kilogram or one pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, to live longer than those who maintained the weight they had at age 35. This finding seems at variance with other studies that have associated weight gain with a host of health problems that tend to lower life expectancy.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparently conflicting findings?

(A) As people age, muscle and bone tissue tends to make up a smaller and smaller proportion of total body weight.
(B) Individuals who reduce their cholesterol levels by losing weight can thereby also reduce their risk of dying from heart attacks or strokes.
(C) Smokers, who tend to be leaner than nonsmokers, tend to have shorter life spans than nonsmokers.
(D) The normal deterioration of the human immune system with age can be slowed down by a reduction in the number of calories consumed.
(E) Diets that tend to lead to weight gain often contain not only excess fat but also unhealthful concentrations of sugar and sodium.
Its really tough....
IMO E
whats the OA ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:54 am
It should be D, it is the only option that shows a benefit in health caused by weight gain

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:21 am
A long-term health study that followed a group of people who were age 35 in 1950 found that those whose weight increased by approximately half a kilogram or one pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, to live longer than those who maintained the weight they had at age 35. This finding seems at variance with other studies that have associated weight gain with a host of health problems that tend to lower life expectancy.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparently conflicting findings?

(A) As people age, muscle and bone tissue tends to make up a smaller and smaller proportion of total body weight.
[Can be a contender but dose not explain how weight gain increase life expectancy .]
(B) Individuals who reduce their cholesterol levels by losing weight can thereby also reduce their risk of dying from heart attacks or strokes.
[Not correct , as it says loosing weight increase life expectancy ]
(C) Smokers, who tend to be leaner than nonsmokers, tend to have shorter life spans than nonsmokers.
[Out of scope smokers are not discussed]
(D) The normal deterioration of the human immune system with age can be slowed down by a reduction in the number of calories consumed.
[This is the correct answer that shows people live longer because deterioration of the human immune system can be slowed down by reducing the calories consumed. But reducing calories dose not mean loosing weight so weight increases and also life expectancy increase . ]
(E) Diets that tend to lead to weight gain often contain not only excess fat but also unhealthful concentrations of sugar and sodium.
[Address only one part of paradox , can be eliminated .]
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am
Thanked: 3 times

by boazkhan » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:50 am
I have my doubts on D. What is the OA?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:26 am

by mj41 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:08 pm
Wait up guys I am really confused... most people are going for D. But D clearly states "reducing calories" which would lead to a loss of weight as apposed to a gain shown in the study.

Can someone please explain as none of the choices seem correct to me

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:35 pm
mj41 wrote:Wait up guys I am really confused... most people are going for D. But D clearly states "reducing calories" which would lead to a loss of weight as apposed to a gain shown in the study.

Can someone please explain as none of the choices seem correct to me
You need to think logically and not practically . What I mean to say is more often than not the test creator will put in such things that will conflict with the real life scenario and this is a perfect example of this trick that test makers use.

Now in real life reducing calories may or may not lead to weight reduction but will certainly not result in increase in weight .

But when coming to CR we only have to use the evidence give in the stimuli to prove the argument.

This finding seems at variance with other studies that have associated weight gain with a host of health problems that tend to lower life expectancy.


The above statement gives a contradictory scenario where weight gain is associated with health problems .

But actually it is seen that people whose weight increase tend to live longer .

Now if we are to find the discrepancy we need to provide some evidence that proves both sides of the argument to be true.

Now if we can prove that the study was wrong and weight has nothing to do with increasing or decreasing life expectancy


The argument falls apart .

And option D dose exactly that.

The normal deterioration of the human immune system with age can be slowed down by a reduction in the number of calories consumed.


It dose not say that people above 35 who gain weight have a greater life expectancy instead it provides altogether different scenario stating that decrease in calories slows the deterioration of immune system and thus increase chances of survival .

This reduce is calories has been mistaken as trying to reduce weight and thus leads to the wrong conclusion that reducing weight will increase life expectancy .

Hope this helps .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 6:04 pm

by ritish » Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:08 am
IMO C

what's the official answer?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:26 am

by mj41 » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:25 am
Thanks again rockeyb although you make sense I'm still a litle lost

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:43 am
mj41 wrote:Thanks again rockeyb although you make sense I'm still a litle lost
@rockeyb

I am sorry to say this!! None of the answers resolve the discrepancy. As a thumb rule, the answer should try to map the discrepancies of the both the sides.

D altogether brings new info which is way out of the discussion!!

@Harsha!
I am concerned over the source of the question.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 68 times
GMAT Score:680

by harshavardhanc » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:53 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
D altogether brings new info which is way out of the discussion!!

@Harsha!
I am concerned over the source of the question.
My hands are clean! ;)

Calling harsh.champ!!!!!
Regards,
Harsha

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:02 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:
D altogether brings new info which is way out of the discussion!!

@Harsha!
I am concerned over the source of the question.
My hands are clean! ;)

Calling harsh.champ!!!!!
ehehehe Sorrry bro!!

Small confusionzzzzzzzzzzz

But still u can share ur Gyan..Not a crime !!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:02 am

I totally agree with rockey's reasoning. Answer has to be (D).

Reduction in calories should not be confused with reduction in weight. A few people here have argued that reduction in calories lead to weight loss. Even in real life situations a mere caloric reduction DOES NOT necessarily lead to weight loss. Many times we are suprised by people around us who eat much less and still dont manage to lose weight. The On the other hand we may also see people who eat A LOT and still manage to remain skinny. Sometimes it makes us wonder how these people can consume massive amount of calories and still dont put on weight. My point is that there is definitely a possibility that there are other factors besides CALORIES that lead to WEIGHT GAIN n WEIGHT LOSS.

In the passage above, the argument is about people who are age 35 who gained weight. But WEIGHT GAIN does not necessarily mean THEY CONSUME MORE CALORIES. Weight gain could be result of something else such as low metabolism, inactive lifestyle, certain medications etc.

Here only answer choice (D) makes sense. Hence it is correct.