BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Alba ques...

Expert replies
by shipra » Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:58 am
15. Alba: I don’t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next election. She is not a strong supporter of the war against crime.
Tam: But Senator Frank sponsored the latest anticrime law passed by the Senate.
Alba: If Senator Frank sponsored it, it can’t be a very strong anticrime law.
Which of the following identifies the most serious logical flaw in Alba’s reasoning?
(A) The facts she presents do not support her conclusion that Senator Frank is soft on crime.
(B) She assumes without proof that crime is the most important issue in the upcoming election.
(C) She argues in a circle, using an unsupported assertion to dismiss conflicting evidence.
(D) She attacks Senator Frank on personal grounds rather than on he merit as a political leader.
(E) In deciding not to vote for Senator Frank, she fails to consider issues other than crime.


OA- C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sulabh » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:42 am
C is right.Alba makes an unsupported assertion that Senator Frank is not a strong supporter of the war against crime and uses the same assertion to dismiss the evidence provided by Tam.

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by g_beatthegmat » Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:57 pm
also, please use the spoiler tag if you mention the OA at all in the first post.

thanks.
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:11 am
Looking at it now, C makes sense
Join the discussion