BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wolves and human---Explain

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:12 am
Wolves generally avoid human settlements. For this reason, domestic sheep, though essentially easy prey for wolves, are not usually attacked by them. In Hylantia prior to 1910, farmers nevertheless lost considerable numbers of sheep to wolves each year. Attributing this to the large number for wolves, in 1910 the government began offering rewards to hunters for killing wolves. From 1910 to 1915, large numbers of wolves were killed. Yet wolf attacks on sheep increased significantly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in wolf attacks on sheep?

A. Populations of deer and other wild animals that wolves typically prey on increased significantly in numbers from 1910 to 1915.

B. Prior to 1910, there were no legal restrictions in Hylantia on the hunting of wolves.

C. After 1910 hunters shot and wounded a substantial number of wolves, thereby greatly diminishing these wolves’ ability to prey on wild animals.

D. Domestic sheep are significantly less able than most wild animals to defend themselves against wolf attacks.

E. The systematic hunting of wolves encouraged by the program drove many wolves in Hylantia to migrate to remote mountain areas uninhabited by humans.

OA: C

I narrowed down the answer to C and E.
But chose E instead.

can someone explain why E is wrong and C is better?

thank u!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shenoydevika » Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:44 am
Hello!

First, break down the question. What are we told?
1. - Wolves avoid human settlements. Therefore, domestic sheep are safe from wolf attacks even though they are easy prey.
2. - However, In H, prior to 1910, farmers lost a lot of sheep to wolf attacks. (awww)
3. - The government believed this was because there were too many wolves. So they started rewarding hunters to kill wolves.

So what would be the logical conclusion for such a policy? The wolf packs would diminish in number and all the sheep would be safe right? But then we are told this...
5. - Even though a large number of wolves were killed, the attack on sheep increased.

We are told to choose the option which would best explain this.

(C) is the best. It says that hunters wounded a lot of wolves. These wounded creatures couldn't hunt in the wild and were forced to attack the domestic sheep. That is why the attack on sheep increased.

Why not E? E says all the hunting drove the wolves away. If the wolves escaped to a place where there were no humans, how would the attacks on sheep in Hylantia increase? E doesn't give us a reasonable explanation for the increase on wolf attacks.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:33 am
the poster above me has given a pretty nice summary.

to generalize -- always state, as precisely and concisely as possible, exactly what you have to explain before you go digging through the answer choices.
in this problem, what you have to explain is:
why were there more attacks on domesticated sheep?

(c) provides a plausible reason: injured wolves needed an easier target to hunt. the argument explicitly states that domestic sheep are easier targets for wolves, so, there you go.

(e), on the other hand, doesn't explain what has been observed at all. in fact, if the wolves have migrated to remote regions, we would expect fewer attacks on domesticated sheep (who live with human herders) -- exactly the opposite of what was observed.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion