Companies

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

Companies

by SmarpanGamt » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:05 am
Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.
Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?



(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.
(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.
(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.
(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.
(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.


Please explain
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Rourkela/Hyderabad
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by sanp_l » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:21 am
Hi,

I would go with Option D.

In the method used, costs, selling prices, and share of market are constant. hence the disadvantage has got to something with any of these three factors.

Option D hits on the selling price and market share dependencies of the method and thus can be of the most serios disadvantage to firms using the method.
Sandy

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:43 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:720

by analyst218 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:24 am
//D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

by SmarpanGamt » Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:47 am
sanp_l wrote:Hi,

I would go with Option D.

In the method used, costs, selling prices, and share of market are constant. hence the disadvantage has got to something with any of these three factors.

Option D hits on the selling price and market share dependencies of the method and thus can be of the most serios disadvantage to firms using the method.
Thank you Sandy