CR - Strengthen argument using situation

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members
Of the 60 participants in a clinical trial, 30 participants were considered to be in the experimental group, and were administered a large dose of an experimental painkiller called nexaphedrinol, while the 30 remaining participants were considered to be in the control group, and were administered the same dose of a placebo. Afterward, participants in the experimental group exhibited fine motor skills that were more diminished than those of the control group. The observed detrimental effects on fine motor skills were attributed to a compound in nexaphedrinol called phedrine, which temporarily damages nerve endings.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the conclusion that a certain compound in the painkiller was responsible for the observed results?


(A) Nexaphedrinol has been found to be the most effective painkiller available in a variety of preceding experiments that utilized similar methodologies.

(B) Phedrine is a relatively ubiquitous compound found in a variety of medicines, some of which may have been taken by the participants in the experiment.

(C) The placebo administered to the participants in the experiment did not contain phedrine but may have contained a compound with similar effects on nerve endings.

(D) All the participants in the experiment were found to have had comparable fine motor skills prior to the administration of the nexaphedrinol or the placebo.

(E) Most customers suffering from chronic pain have indicated that they would be willing to suffer a decrease in fine motor skills in exchange for an effective painkiller.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:14 pm
IMO D

You have two groups of people administered with two different medicines and find out that the performance of one group is worse than the other and blame it on the medicine, but how can you evaluate that without knowing how their condition was before administering the medicine. So that is the strengthener. All other options are irrelevant.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:26 am
OA is D
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---