BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Ans does not make sense

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:39 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times
by khurram » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 am
In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?



A Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
B Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
C The undated document was written before 1765.
D The arrest record was written after the undated document.
E The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.

A -Out of Scope
B -Out of Scope
C Maybe yes maybe No, But not Definitive
D- Maybe Yes
E-Out of Scope

Ans is C but why cannot it be D.
Thanks
Khurram
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pmFollowed by: 614 members
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
GMAT Score:800

Re: Ans does not make sense

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:05 pm
khurram wrote:In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?



A Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
B Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
C The undated document was written before 1765.
D The arrest record was written after the undated document.
E The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.

A -Out of Scope
B -Out of Scope
C Maybe yes maybe No, But not Definitive
D- Maybe Yes
E-Out of Scope

Ans is C but why cannot it be D.
Thanks
Khurram
Any question which asks us to draw a conclusion is an Inference question. The correct answer to an inference question is something that MUST be true based on what's stated or implied by one or more pieces of information provided.

Based on the facts provided (the one thing that I don't like about this question is that we're never actually told that the assertions in the stimulus are true; on the GMAT, almost certainly the question would have read "The facts above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?"), we know that:

(1) he was arrested for peddling without a license in 1739; and
(2) he wrote a note in which he asserted that he had been peddling for 20 years.

If the note is true, it must have been written, at the latest, in 1759. If the note had been written in 1765, then it would be inaccurate. Therefore, (c) MUST be true.

COULD the arrest record have been written after the undated statement? Sure, maybe 1739 was his 50th anniversary of peddling - we have no clue. Since we have no clue if it's true or not, (d) is definitely NOT the correct answer to an inference question. (a), (b) and (e) are also things that COULD be true, but that's not what we're looking for.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:39 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 4 times

by khurram » Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:46 pm
Thanks very much.

Khurram
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Tue May 10, 2016 11:39 pm
i must admit that C seems to be the answer. What's OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1