Option E: This option would be out of scope as it does not affect the argument at all...
Option D: This option would weakens the FAA's argument as it says that the small aircrafts have enough wealth so that they themselves can pay for the expansion.
Option A: This is a good answer choice but it does not give a strong reasoning to the FAA's reccomendation. This answer choice is more of a flashy lights on the New York Street which will draw many customers but unfortunately not the correct answer.
Option B: Overall Volume effect is out of scope as we are not talking about the cost being divided between all the people who are or will be using the airport together. The idea is about the current travelers paying for the small aircrafts and so taking all the cost burden for those small aircrafts. This is also out of scope.
OPtion C: A perfect answer and a good reasoning for the FAA, as it tells that the funding will help the existing aircrafts to not face air traffic because of the current congestion. It says that this is beneficial to the existing aircrafts using the airport. Hence the correct answer is C.
Hope this helps!!!
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
